Many feminists argue that prohitibition of prostitution and polygamy   
   protect women's right.   
      
   What right is protected by prohibiting consensual offers from males?   
      
   What about women that want several husband? What about women that would   
   rather share a handsome, smart, rich male than be the only one for a   
   poor dumb violent one?   
      
   How many females got beaten up by violent dumb males because those   
   females do not have enough loving billionares playboy to pick?   
      
   What about women's right to rent her womb or cunt to the highest   
   bidder? What about women's right to choose any rich males that want to   
   have sex with her for money?   
      
   Without prohibition of consensual acts, women that got beaten up just   
   once by a boyfriend, can say, "fuck it I am done", and quickly choose   
   to become a misress for a loving rich male. No need to count on cops or   
   anything. Those violent bastard were lucky if they got chosen in the   
   first place.   
      
   In many countries where genital multilation is common,   
   The more a male doesn't have positive intensive to mate with females,   
   the more likely the male would, out of jealousy, use negative   
   intensives to keep women in line.   
      
   In many countries, women face genital mutilation, burned alive, etc.   
   Without prohibition of prostitution, women can quickly go to males that   
   can resort to positive intensives, like money, to persuade females,   
   rather than negative intensives motivated by jealousy.   
      
   Without regulation against consensual acts, women also have more   
   choices to earn quick money and become financially independent by   
   performing in strip clubs, selling virginity, etc.   
      
   Also, I believe the true purpose of anti prostitution, anti polygamy,   
   and child support law is to take away choices from females. It's there   
   to ration females to less desirable poorer financially irresponsible   
   males.   
      
   I am not against women being financially independent. 50% of females   
   are smarter than 50% of males. So yes, women can be anything they want   
   too. Engineer, astronout, boxer, nude boxer, etc. However, women will   
   be better of even further if they can take advantage of monetary   
   consensual offers from males.   
      
   Christian would love this too. When prostitution is allowed, women can   
   say, I'll bear a baby for $1 million. Now, which women would abort   
   their baby if good rich daddy will pay her $1 million for delivering   
   his.   
      
   Not just money. The rich often carry better genes. Women are more   
   likely to abort their baby when the quality of the sperm that knock her   
   up is low. If a woman have a potentially genius baby, why abort it?   
      
   It's a win win solution. The only person that got anything to lose is   
   the less desirable poor males. Ugly feminists that are jealous of what   
   pretty women can achieve might also disagree, but even they can aim   
   "higher" without sex regulation. But fuck them. Women can vote too   
   right? Vote for freedom. Vote for women choice! Vote libertarian   
   solutions.   
      
   "Know the truth, the truth will set you free" - Jesus.   
   "...But before it does, it will make you angry." -Jerry Joiner   
   Bob   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)