[continued from previous message]   
      
   and pleasure inducing algorithm, in other word, preferences, matched   
   what worked in the Gene Pool in the past are the kind of humans that   
   are common nowadays.   
      
   We like to have sex because sex improved gene pool survival. We avoid   
   shit because eating shit decrease gene pool survival.   
      
   Gene pool survival is almost a zero sum game. What does that mean?   
      
   Under capitalism, we can make a lot of money in ways that's mutually   
   beneficial. Money wise, Capitalism is NOT a zero sum game. The main   
   issue in Capitalism is not who should get the money. In capitalism, the   
   main issue is how to make more money for the good of all.   
      
   However, because the earth is getting full, gene pool survival issue is   
   more about who will be in the gene pool than how to get bigger pool.   
   When one gains more the other get less.   
      
   With capitalism, one country can be richer and richer. So a person can   
   make so much money without hurting others' interest right?   
      
   Wrong... Depend on what you mean by interest. When a male makes so much   
   money, he'll become more attractive to females. Then more females   
   will choose to share him than be the only one for other males. Such   
   males, the alpha males, will survive well in the gene pool. This of   
   course hurt the gene pool survival of less capable males.   
      
   Hence if A chooses an act that profits him by $10 and profits B to by   
   $1, B will still hate A. That's because A's and B's instincts are   
   built for gene pool survival. A will try to mate with as many females   
   as possible. Because A makes more money, more females will be attracted   
   to A, reducing females available to B.   
      
   That's the reason why many losers in US are pro communist. Those   
   workers are already benefited under capitalism. However, they are envy   
   that the productive even earn more than them.   
      
   A preference is then developed among many humans to stop, prevent, and   
   if possible, exterminate superiority. The preference manifests in envy   
   and unexplained hatred to those that is superior to them. But how does   
   everyone detects superiority? By achievements. That is why those who   
   achieves more are often those that are hatred.   
      
   When you are successful, expect hatred. It doesn't matter how you do   
   it. You can do it in the most fair, consensual, and beneficial ways as   
   possible. Still someone, somewhere, somehow, will come up with who   
   knows what fairy tales to somehow justify that you're wrong and that   
   you shouldn't do it.   
      
   You may not mean to offend them, but the mere acts of being successful   
   offend people, especially losers, enough.   
      
   You can make a lot of money honestly while providing many jobs for   
   others. Then what? Then someone, that takes jobs, rather than creating   
   it, will say that you have to use inferior technology so you can hire   
   more workers. Someone that works from 9 to 5 will say that you're   
   enslaved by money because you want more after you have enough. Then   
   they accused you of greed and somehow greed is evil.   
      
   Politicians never accuse you of greed for wanting someone else money,   
   it's always somewhere around wanting your own money. Then when all   
   things fail, they'll just kill you, like the Jews.   
      
   Then what should smart more capable people do then?   
      
   One solution is to proceed as usual. Make a lot of money through   
   capitalism. And then bitch when you get killed. That's what   
   libertarians, and many Jews, and Chinese do all over the place.   
      
   Their cause is just, but not a winning one. After all, if you're   
   death, even if you're right, you're not really a winner right.   
   Others will just prejudicially conclude that you're wrong. They're   
   envy to you. They want people to believe you're inferior. The more   
   you show otherwise, the more you offend their cherished believe. The   
   more they're mad. The more rich smart males show that they make money   
   honestly, fairly, productively, the more the poor will get mad.   
      
   Another solution is to stop being too successful so not to offend envy   
   people. Now it's pathetic. First of all, people want to exterminate   
   those superior than them. Hiding achievements won't help. It's the   
   genes they want to kick out. Up to the 10th century, the Jews practice   
   polygamy. Thanks to inquisition killing of their dumb, and lack of   
   prohibition of marriage against smart scholars, Jews' are smarter,   
   which soon leads to richer. Jewish males consensually attract more   
   females. Polygamy happen when one male successfully win the heart of   
   more than many females, which is natural for rich smart males.   
      
   Needless to say the other Europeans' males are mad, but too embarrassed   
   to say frankly what the real reason is. So to appease the Europeans, a   
   rabbi prohibits polygamy where customs prohibit it. The prohibition's   
   true purpose is to ration females in equal share for everyone manner to   
   all men. The pretext varies from religious, ideology, females' interest   
   (usually something vague, like dignity) to who knows what now.   
      
   Then what? Does the prosecution of the Jews ended. No. History shows   
   that Jews kept being prosecuted till the end of WW II.   
      
   Second, out of all less capable people needs, the most impossible to   
   satisfy is envy. You can provide welfare parasites with food, shelter,   
   job, etc. You can do so with little or even no sacrifice. Yet, if you   
   want to satisfy their envy, the sacrifice will be too great because the   
   very thing they ask is your failure and suffering, not any gain on   
   their part.   
      
   I like the third solution. Did you ever notice that Saddam, Suharto,   
   Evita, Marcos, Kim Yong Ill, are pretty smart. They "balance" their   
   financial achievements with military and political achievements.   
      
   Dictatorship is simply a natural answer against stubborn cultures that   
   fail to embrace meritocracy and individual freedom. Winners will be   
   winners anyway. If not through capitalism, through dictatorship. If not   
   through productivity, through corruption.   
      
   Problem solved, for the actor that's willing to fight fire with fire.   
      
   Hei, what can we say? It's the society that deviates from   
   meritocracy. If the rest of the population wants to deviate from   
   meritocracy, it's natural that what maximizes one's profit is not   
   what maximizes productivity as a whole. Perhaps that'll teach all   
   society a lesson in meritocracy. Any deviation from meritocracy will   
   simply make everyone lose.   
      
   Isn't there a more humane solution?   
      
   Yes there is. There is a time when superior people and inferior people   
   live in harmony. Soldiers under the command of Zhuge Liang, knows that   
   their life expectancy is an increasing function of Zhuge's IQ.   
      
   The Jews also get more respects among European not after they appease   
   Europeans more, but after one Jew, Einstein, help builds nuclear bomb   
   for the lesser evil, suggesting how valuable smart people is for a   
   society. Doing so shows that being smarter benefit less capable humans'   
   gene pool survival too.   
      
   The time when people live in harmony is when they have common enemy. In   
   other word, war. I sense problem in this solution. So bear with me   
   okay.   
      
   The Old Testament in the bible, for example, suggests of attacking   
   other countries, kill all the males, and grab the females. Apparently,   
   few things are serious sin under Christianity, save polygamy and   
   watching porn.   
      
   Anyway, the acts mean males can have many females, and the rest get a   
   share too. The existences of the smart people then help improve the   
   gene pool survival of the other males. Am I suggesting that? Ugh...   
   No...   
      
   But there is a humane capitalistic libertarian version of that. In many   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)