[continued from previous message]   
      
   beldam has publicly damaged my friend's reputation though. He needs to   
   stop the bad mouthing which he thought is caused by misunderstanding.   
   He also wants to keep this issue private to avoid mutual embarrassment.   
   All while politely pointing out that she's really not that important   
   for any reasonable businessman to pretend to be her friend as she   
   claimed. So her claim that anyone would pretend to be her friend is   
   ridiculous.   
      
   So he wrote:   
   >I don't mind your comments about me as long as it is true. So keep in mind   
   that we did chat in a friendly way and we were indeed in   
   >each other network, which you can check, before saying anything about me.   
   Also, *******'s definition of spamming is trying to sell   
   >something without intent to network which is far from what I do.   
   >I'll try to get both of us disconnected. ...you could have understood and   
   tell me privately like Peter did. Then we could have really been   
   >friend. It's a tragedy, but I got 400+ other friends to concentrate on.   
      
   He wanted to response to the scoundrel's public accusation but at that   
   time, the gorgon's ranting has incited enough people to get his account   
   blocked preventing him to do that. Before, he didn't receive any single   
   complaint.   
      
   Now this might have been a big mistake. What sort of thing an ugly   
   lonely old hag would ppppppee ppe phhheeeeeeeeeeelllllll when she   
   realized she's not a miss universe?... And I used to think Kobe is   
   wrong.   
      
   Then she wrote:   
      
   >Put me in front of a concrete wall. Let my bash my head against it. What are   
   we dealing with here? Arrogance, stupidity, a language >barrier?   
   >This was sent to my personal email address this morning. I would very much   
   like to know what your response would be to this person! It >is the ubiquitous   
   ***** AGAIN.   
      
   >I have never chatted to or had any discussion with this person. I find his   
   spamming methods completely unacceptable. I have   
      
   >complained, but it has served no purpose.   
      
   >Our main concern is to get rid of people like this. Your smugness is a little   
   premature   
      
   >Thanks ***** - and to all of you who exposed this little **** for what he   
   really was   
      
   >It really is hilarious. What a sad, sad little man he is   
      
   >Have a look at yesterday's thread on this Nina. It's not as innocent as you   
   think   
      
   >But as Jim said - some of the oddballs on here are like bindweed.   
      
   >Reputation: 0 (this is not true. As a medalist in international physics   
   olympiad and many other math competition, and a successful capitalist that   
   built business from scratch into one of the fastest growing business in the   
   world, my friend naturally has    
   a very significant reputation. He also actively promotes capitalism, free   
   trade, individual freedom, and woman's right while preventing discrimination,   
   frictions, church burning, and other parasitic behaviors. In the network, he   
   got 400+ network members,    
   112 good rating. Which that thing has known before claiming he has 0   
   reputation. That is far more members and good rating in 2-3 days than what the   
   number that harpy has built for years)   
      
   >LOL Paul! My God, does this specimen ever stop? What Planet is he on? Wil we   
   ever see the back of him?   
   >As a cat lover I feel we must mount a rescue mission to save ****** from this   
   sad, bewildered person!   
   >This is unreal, isn't it   
      
   All this while my friend cannot do anything to publicly reply to   
   explain his side of the story. It's amazing to see the determination of   
   undesirable old hags with nothing positive things to offer to regain   
   the self respect their genes denied them. Another even uglier old hag   
   even fantasized and publicly accused my friend, which live half a globe   
   away, for stalking.   
      
   It seems that the uglier the female, the more creative they are at   
   bumping up the little self worth they have.   
      
   Who wants to stalk those specimens? Who wants to sleep with that thing   
   even if he's paid? The whole point of making a lot of money is so we   
   don't end up with one of those even for an hour. Why in the fucking   
   earth that trot complaint that she's afraid of being stalked?   
      
   You can approach the prettiest goddess and the worse you get is a   
   "no" answer (guess what's the best?). You can claim that rich   
   highly reputable businessmen are your friend, and the worse you can get   
   is a polite objection.   
      
   Yet, you don't even have to approach ugly beldam to get stalking   
   accusation. And a sick fuck no body will make a big deal of friendly   
   messages.   
      
   Not only that, an unknown married male sympathizer, Mitch, which is   
   probably over represented in the gene pool, accuse my friend for not   
   being able to get chicks. That accusation is not true of course.   
      
   What the fuck is wrong with British people? Well, I'll tell you   
   straight here. Real males aim for as many females as possible. In   
   western civilization, that means outside marriage. Marriage is a highly   
   cost inefficient prostitution still done mainly due to huge   
   government's intervention on our private life causing one of the most   
   obnoxious market distortion ever. It's part of our mission to free   
   everyone from such stupid obsolete institution that typically last till   
   bitter divorce do them part anyway.   
      
   We can only wonder what sort of insidious dark whatever resides on   
   those vermin mind. Maybe she thinks slandering is a cheap way to get   
   publicity on her otherwise lonely and dark life that she turned a small   
   friendly mistake into a big problem. Maybe she's just dumb. Who knows?   
      
   Then my friend found a copy of Katherine's own message to her.   
      
   >Hi [My Friends' name]   
   >   
   >Many thanks for your message.   
   >   
   >Remind me what *** is again?   
   >   
   >There are some networks that I simply don't bother with anymore.   
   >   
   >Best wishes   
   >   
   >Katherine   
      
   May be this is a misunderstanding. May be she forgot. We try to solve   
   this peacefully by showing her her own message. Another friend asks her   
   whether she wrote her own friendly message or not. My friend is told to   
   just get a life, which is very rude.   
      
   When someone that hear about this show her message in public, she said   
   she's not mad (which is a lie, her private message clearly says she is   
   very angry). She said she ignore this sort of thing. Well, this article   
   wouldn't be here if she ignore small things.   
      
   We gently explain our case and ask for explanation and the bitch simply   
   point that my friend is so stupid he can't differentiate a friendly   
   reply from a "sod of". Well, she's so stupid (or pretend she is) that   
   she can't differentiate between people trying to be friendly and   
   people trying to fraud her friends by pretending to be her friend.   
      
   We don't what "sod off" mean. So maybe she's quite right that my friend   
   is dumb at some areas. You know what? We usually tolerate that, knowing   
   those who speak against us are usually just sad morons. However, now   
   that those morons can convince enough other morons to make quite an   
   impact, we don't like that.   
      
   So we call our lawyers in England only to found out that house of   
   common has not legalized exterminating obnoxious vermins.   
      
   We'll just have to do this the civilized way. That thing asks for   
   everyone's opinion and wanting some hostile public argument, we'll give   
   her one.   
      
   It's about time this bitch fights someone that fights back. Also we   
   change our anger toward compassion for any companies that waste their   
   money hiring this dumb thing.   
      
   Because of her act, a small number of people that have not listen to   
   the other side got mad. That small number of people attracted the   
   attention of one of the chief executive, which is the asshole's friend.   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)