[continued from previous message]   
      
   needy only need some cash. However, these super parasites are the most   
   parasitic individuals in the whole world.   
      
   The best and brightest are not the only one screwed by these super   
   parasites. More capable individual, under meritocratic society, tend to   
   give far more productivity than they consume. In fact, some would argue   
   that only top 2% of humans population that's actually responsible for   
   all the productivity in the world. That opinion is overrated because it   
   takes into account those who earn more than global market due to   
   immigration restrictions as parasites too.   
      
   Many of those high paid people will also be able to earn more or spend   
   more as businessmen if immigration restrictions are gone. Under this   
   communist world where the productive are condemned to excessively   
   support the parasitic, often, the more money you earn, the more you   
   deserve every cents of it. Hence, it's still true that the minority of   
   the super productive is responsible for most productivity in this   
   world.   
      
   Therefore, the whole world become worst of when the best of brightest   
   keep being harassed by jealous inferiors.   
      
   Efforts spend on defending against non sense accusation could have been   
   used for more productive that at the end will benefit most humans in   
   the world including many people that are less hostile to the more   
   productive.   
      
   Hence, I will show all those minority groups what they really should   
   have done to avoid their prosecution for their own benefits and for the   
   benefits of the rest of the world. Strike back!   
      
   I'll show it by a sample.   
      
   1. The importance of being hostile to any envy vermins that we found.   
   2. I want to prevent this from happening to other people from making   
   other mistake of thinking that someone like that Katherine Trimble is a   
   friend.   
   3. Clear up the name of our friend against a very determined slander   
   campaign made by that bag against our friend. In case you see her   
   slander, this is the story from our point of view so you listen from   
   both sides. This is only if you know my friend's name. If not never   
   mind. Not that it matters any more but we really feel to get this of.   
      
   I got a friend of mine that is a successful entrepreneur. He is going   
   to be one of the most well connected individual in the whole world one   
   way or another to impress his mentors. After almost achieving it one of   
   the person that he communicate with is that bat.   
      
   The beldam, like all the others, friendly replied. If any doesn't reply   
   friendly, we would have noted it and avoid problem.   
      
   My friend is so happy founding many new friends. Then he noticed a   
   feature in the network called "friend of friend" that refer to someone   
   in your network's network. He friendly contacts his "friends of   
   friends" while properly giving credit to his first degree friend. You   
   know messages like:   
      
   >Dear ****,   
   >   
   >Hi,   
   >   
   >I found out that you are a friend of my friend, (a person's name). Well any   
   friend of (that person) should be my friend too.   
   >   
   >Hope things are working out in ...   
   >   
   >Happy networking,   
   >   
   >******   
   That's it. No threat or fraud. Not even a selling or service. Nothing.   
   The term friend of friend is simply the official definition. My friend   
   just want to network. That looks friendly enough. What sort of demon   
   incarnated/possessed hell bound lost soul could get offended by such a   
   friendly message.   
      
   Apparently that biddy forgot that she is in each others' network with   
   my friend. So,   
      
   She got mad at him. Send him an email saying she is very angry.   
   She insisted that she never communicated.   
   She told him not to contact her again.   
   In public she publishes this:   
      
   >BEWARE: Spam using my name is doing the rounds   
   >   
   >If any of my network buddies find themselves getting a mesage from someone   
   proporting to be "a great friend of Kat Trimble" PLEASE >IGNORE IT.   
   >   
   >Someone is using this ruse to get to all my network contacts -   
   >on the premise that he is a great friend of mine.   
   >   
   >This is not how I network (of course not, what's her IQ?)   
   >and I am sorry that you have targeted in this manner   
   loathe spam messages. If I connect you with any of my   
   >valued contacts believe me you'll get a message from me first, or a personal   
   introduction face to face.   
   >   
   >This is a first for me. Be wary - you might be next   
   >   
   >Yours in fury!   
      
   She publish that my friend is a spammer possibly without ensuring first   
   that her accusation match the official policy of spam in the network.   
      
   The official rule for spam in the network is: Spam Un-invited promotion   
   of products and services with no thought or attention to networking.   
   Which is far from what my friend did. Many people emailed him showing   
   support telling that he did nothing wrong.   
      
   Also, let's get realistic here. Sure my friend is wrong to credit that   
   monster as a friend. But that is not a pretense. She friendly replied,   
   and the term friend of friend is simply the official definition in the   
   network. Also, with his connections, she needs to be a pope for   
   accusation of using her name to gain unearned trust and fraud her   
   friends to make any sense at all.   
      
   Apparently this idiot cannot differentiate between people having   
   fraudulent intent and those just trying to be friendly. Or may be he   
   knows, and deliberately use vague terms.   
      
   If she doesn't want to be credited as friend, she'll do well by not   
   feigning friendliness. What can be gained for pretending to be her   
   friend anyway? What makes the vermin think she's so special? Racism? If   
   there is any dishonest assholes that pretend to be anyone's friend,   
   it's that bitch.   
      
   And of course she doesn't network like he did. What's her IQ? Now how   
   can he show this attention whore all this without damaging her fragile   
   ego and set her off even more?   
      
   The more ridiculous an accusation, the more cognitive dissonant people   
   feel when you try to explain. The more intensive the accusers have to   
   maintain the beliefs. People don't crave the truth; they crave   
   prejudices that serve their interests. That's why we have religions.   
   Never underestimate the awesome power of bullshit accusations or   
   beliefs.   
      
   True misunderstanding can be sorted out. Prejudiced motivated ones will   
   provoke even more anger and violent from those who try to oppose it.   
   Explanation is simply not the way to go.   
      
   My friend is quite confused why he is accused of spamming despite the   
   official policy and why it causes so much anger given that it's kind of   
   harmless, but he apologized anyway. My friend then friendly apologized   
   and tries to explain.   
   ...   
   >But we did have a chat before and I remember your pic. Maybe next time I   
   should just say I am a member of Katherine's network?   
   ...   
   >What other mistakes do I have made here?   
   ...   
   >Sorry   
   >Just don't get too mad okay?   
      
   It is clear from my friend's friendly message that the sort of act will   
   not be repeated. I mean, maybe he made a mistake. The old hag reply:   
      
      
   >You are not in my chosen network.  We have not talked/chatted and I do not   
   >like the way you ramp up your connections (envy seems to be her main motive).   
   >People are not happy (I guess low IQ must have come in package with illusion   
   of psychic power possesion.) with what   
   >you have done, they are just being polite. (if they're not happy why not just   
   say so?)   
   >   
   >I do not choose to be in your network and will not consider you being in   
   >mine.   
   >   
   >   
   >Please do not contact me again.  The damage (what damage? How much money is   
   lost?) is already done and you are   
   >entirely responsible for your current reputation.   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)