[continued from previous message]   
      
   the other side got mad. That small number of people attracted the   
   attention of one of the chief executive, which is the asshole's friend.   
   The small minded worm, out of favoritism use out of context   
   misquotation from almost never visited joke page of my friend's   
   personal homepage as a pretext to kick my friend out of the network.   
   That guy will need to redefine his definition of enormous damage.   
      
   Oh ya, a person that tries to sort this out peacefully are also kicked   
   out of the network for "Provoking issues that [the CE] has made   
   decision"   
      
   It's for a good thing actually. Now we do not have to tone down our   
   response at all. I bet this way we can write even more provoking   
   articles.   
      
   At first we thougth that the CE must have had another   
   missunderstanding. However, his reluctant to explain why he claims my   
   friend is spamming despite the official policy, his unusual heroic act   
   to prevent my friend from publishing his side of the story to protect   
   the bitch's reputation, and his insistence that my friend don't contact   
   certain people suggest that the real cause must be favoritism. Who   
   knows what she had on him. We're told not to contact him again. So,   
   we'll just find that out really soon through some other ways.   
      
   His insistence to protect that vermin's reputation forced us to   
   postpone doing it for 1.5 year. Of course, postponing this for 1 year   
   allow us to do this bigger... Why not tag along some social values we   
   believe in.   
      
   In fact it is quite obvious that it's the bitch that break the official   
   rules of   
   "however, we will not tolerate aggression or rudeness towards an   
   individual."   
   "Members should be polite and courteous in their written tone"   
   "Abusive Behavior: All forms of personal attack whether in public or   
   via network messaging"   
      
   All this are of course ignored by the CE due to favoritism.   
      
   My friend then lost a significant portion of his network and need to   
   build his own entirely different networking system. Also he lost his   
   reputation as problem solver that used to be able to bring big result   
   without any significant problem. All because of thinking that the old   
   biddy is her friend and making some small friendly gestures based on   
   that erroneous thinking.   
      
   What can set of this walking time bomb. Over what? Fraud? Thief? Rape   
   (not that anyone will do that to her)? No. These things blow up over a   
   few friendly gestures.   
      
   A long time passed and we're all busy doing other things. Strange   
   puzzles keep floating.   
      
   Why a friend that tries to peacefully sort this thing out also got   
   kicked out of the network?   
      
   Another asks what's the real problem is and no one want to answer.   
   They all just say that my friend is wrong without explaining objective   
   questions raised into it?   
      
   Why the CE works so hard to prevent my friend from publicizing his side   
   of the story? Why no one answer why my friend is accused of spamming   
   despite the official policy that differs from what he did?   
      
   Than a few stuffs start clicking into places. This is not a   
   misunderstanding case. They knew it all along.   
      
   They knew that my friend did not have any intensive to pretend to be   
   anyone's friend as accused.   
      
   Hitler also knew that the Jews didn't start the second world war. He   
   did. And the Germans have enough evidence to guess that too. They just   
   like to believe stuffs that boost their ego.   
      
   Some would argue that we should just let angry parasites to keep their   
   ego.   
      
   However, letting the inferiors that are on our way to keep their ego is   
   the very reason why parasites outnumber productive people nowadays.   
   We've seen that it doesn't work.   
      
   When we call euphemistically call retards: special people, we improve   
   their perceived market value making them look more desirable than they   
   really are. Then they attract sex partners and produce more retards.   
      
   I think a better way is to just show them the truth. Humans are simply   
   not equal and we vary in capability. Those who fail under free trade   
   capitalism are simply inferior.   
      
   The more offended they are the better. That means subconsciously they   
   know we're right. Let's hit those parasites in the only place it can   
   still hurt. Their ego.   
      
   In middle age, the religious leaders also knew that the Jews did not   
   have any intensive to kill Jesus; the religious leaders, whose   
   influenced are undermined by Jesus, did. The other Europeans should   
   have known, they just like beliefs they want to hear.   
      
   The Indonesian's officials also knew that it's not the Chinese or   
   capitalism that ruin the economy; the officials' corruptions and   
   governments involvements in economy did. And the poor knows that too...   
   It's just that the poor need some justification for looting which they   
   want to do.   
      
   All politicians and religious leaders also know that all sex laws, and   
   regulations, and romance indoctrination's effects are to ration females   
   to less desirable males. This reduces the gene pool survival of the   
   best and brightest while forcing females to settle for less desirable   
   males. The rest of the population sort of know too, it's just that they   
   want a share of those females so they just fell along to this   
   irrational romance believe. They just mumble all the way about religion   
   and morality that doesn't make sense.   
      
   Many of us also know that societies often have far less compunction to   
   slaughter the extremely productive rather than the extremely parasitic.   
   In many countries, the most productive people are taxed or slaughtered   
   to support the parasites. Yet, people would go to great length arguing   
   that serial killers, thieves, robbers, burglars shouldn't be put to   
   death or punished heavily.   
      
   The true reason is that the most productive people are, at least   
   arguably, "superior" more capable people they do not want to compete   
   with in the gene pool. They love those thieves, robbers and other   
   parasites because the parasites share their genes and preferences.   
      
   We can appease people' need for food and shelter. The world is so   
   abundance thanks to the exceptionally capable and productive. It may   
   still make sense to appease the true need of the truly needy.   
      
   However, when we try to we appease people's jealousy, when will it end?   
   There'll be no end to it short of communism and we've seen what happen   
   to those who go there. If we appease people's need to make kids without   
   affording it there'll be just more and more poverties.   
      
   When we regulate consensual acts that effectively ration human beings,   
   usually females, to less desirable sex partners rather than giving full   
   choices to those humans to give and take any kind of consensual offers,   
   we're not just shooting our foot, we're inhuman. When we do all of   
   these, when will it end? The less capable will just keep growing in   
   number and soon no one capable and willing enough to be productive is   
   left.   
      
   To the opposite many other common irrational and subjectivity that   
   plagued the dumb prejudiced people explains away their behavior.   
      
   Let's get back to our sample. That thing already attacked my friend   
   publicly, might as well go all the way to safe her face.   
      
   Or perhaps, the real problem is that the asshole is an undesirable   
   lonely crazy old hag with nothing to lose and is very dangerous to deal   
   with. She's the kind of females, sperm donors would want to exclude   
   from recipient list. Our guess is confirmed by her own writing:   
      
   >"A friend of mine asked me a question today, and it made me think about this   
   thorny subject yet again.   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)