XPost: alt.fan.tom-servo, rec.arts.startrek.current, alt.startrek   
   XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv   
   From: 3cjmd@comcast.net   
      
   On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:53:33 +0100, Paul Harper    
   wrote:   
      
   >On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:15:13 GMT, "Fozzi"    
   >wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >>"Paul Harper"  wrote in message   
   >>news:ud6ai29fl6n9g5h29i7umtis03tdtibniu@4ax.com...   
   >>> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:39:03 GMT, "Fozzi"    
   >>> wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>"Paul Harper"  wrote in message   
   >>>>news:de4ai2ppcufcqeun9jb30a6br2g1267425@4ax.com...   
   >>>>> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 12:45:32 GMT, "Fozzi"    
   >>>>> wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>then frankly you need to get the fuck over yourself, if the english   
   >>>>language   
   >>>>was a woman it would be a two bit whore, its hard to find another language   
   >>>>anywhere in the world that hasnt inserted part of itself into the english   
   >>>>language, what you are in love with is dictionary english not english   
   >>>>itself, which didnt even have formal spelling until 180 years ago, besides   
   >>>>it is only a dialect of german anyway.   
   >>>   
   >>> quod erat demonstrandum   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>In this case more like   
   >>   
   >>quo errat demostrator.   
   >>   
   >>I see you have no problems butchering another language with your school boy   
   >>latin,   
   >>   
   >>You do realise that QED correctly refers to a mathematical proof, not a   
   >>logical one dont you?   
   >   
   >QED: Latin. quod erat demonstrandum (which was demonstrated)   
   >   
   >interj. 1. Which was demonstrated; - a phrase used after the   
   >conclusion of some line of reasoning, especially in mathematical or   
   >logical proofs.   
   >   
   >Apology accepted.   
   >   
   >Paul.   
      
   Consensum habemus?   
      
   Cheers,   
      
   Jaime   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)