home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   rec.arts.startrek.fandom      Star trek fandom, or a mental disorder      2,013 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,658 of 2,013   
   anim8rfsk to The Doctor   
   Re: AI/LLM reviews of STNG - Who watches   
   22 Jul 25 13:22:49   
   
   [continued from previous message]   
      
   > mortal. He even puts his life at risk   
   > to convince Liko that he is not a god,   
   > preserving the Mintakans’ rational,   
   > proto-scientific worldview.   
   >   
   > ---   
   >   
   > ## ✅ **Strengths**   
   >   
   > **➊ One of TNG’s best Prime Directive   
   > stories:** This is classic Trek: What   
   > happens when cultural contamination   
   > goes wrong? The ethical dilemma   
   > is clear, believable, and smartly handled.   
   >   
   > **➋ Picard’s finest hour:** This is   
   > Picard at his absolute Trek best — refusing   
   > to be worshipped, risking his own life   
   > to protect a culture’s freedom   
   > from superstition. Stewart sells every word.   
   >   
   > **➌ The Mintakans are compelling:** They’re   
   > not a generic primitive people. They’re   
   > proto-Vulcans — rational thinkers on the   
   > cusp of embracing logic. That makes   
   > the stakes higher: the birth of religion   
   > here is a tragic setback to their natural   
   > development.   
   >   
   > **➠  
    Beautifully tight sci-fi   
   > parable:** The parallels to human   
   > history — how religions can form   
   > from misunderstanding   
   > the unknown — are classic Roddenberry philosophy.   
   >   
   > **➎ Nuria is memorable:** Her scenes with Picard   
   > in the observation lounge are touching   
   > and intelligent — a simple but powerful   
   > exchange between curiosity and compassion.   
   >   
   > ---   
   >   
   > ## ❌ **Weaknesses**   
   >   
   > **➊ A bit on-the-nose:** Some moments   
   > hammer the “primitive people worship   
   > advanced people” idea a bit heavily — but   
   > it’s in the spirit of classic Trek moral clarity.   
   >   
   > **➋ Side characters underused:** Apart from   
   > Nuria and Liko, the other Mintakans blend together.   
   >   
   > **➌ The outpost staff seem weirdly   
   > incompetent:** They lose their camo,   
   > break the Prime Directive,   
   > and get caught very easily — which   
   > feels a bit convenient to spark the plot.   
   >   
   > ---   
   >   
   > ## 🎭 **Standout moments**   
   >   
   > * Picard’s conversation with Nuria, showing her   
   > the Enterprise and explaining life and death.   
   >   
   > * The final standoff where Picard risks   
   > getting shot to prove his mortality.   
   >   
   > * Troi undercover with the Mintakans,   
   > gently guiding them away from superstition.   
   >   
   > ---   
   >   
   > ## 🗨️ **Best line**   
   >   
   >> **Picard:** *“It is the greater arrogance   
   > to assume that we can interfere   
   > with the natural development of a people.”*   
   >   
   > Perfectly sums up the entire Prime   
   > Directive philosophy — Trek in a single line.   
   >   
   > ---   
   >   
   > ## ⭐ **Rating: 9/10**   
   >   
   > **Verdict:** *Who Watches The Watchers*   
   > is *quintessential* Star Trek: moral,   
   > thoughtful, hopeful, and deeply respectful   
   > of the power of reason over superstition.   
   > It’s a story that only Trek would   
   > tell — and only *The Next Generation* could   
   > deliver with such quiet conviction.   
   > One of the best episodes   
   > of Season 3 — and one of the better   
   > Prime Directive stories in the franchise.   
   >   
      
      
      
   --   
   The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca