XPost: alt.fan.tom-servo, rec.arts.startrek.current, alt.startrek   
   XPost: rec.arts.sf.tv   
   From: efor6920@bigpond.net.au   
      
    wrote in message   
   news:1160095430.328280.43220@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...   
   >   
   > Fozzi wrote:   
   >   
   >>   
   >> You do realise that QED correctly refers to a mathematical proof, not a   
   >> logical one dont you?   
   >   
   > You do realise that a logical proof is, by definition, functionally   
   > equivalent to a mathematical one.   
   >   
   Only if it contains a mathematical function somewhere, anywhere, within it.   
      
   cheers   
   fozzi   
      
   PS, Castelvi and Harper pay attention, this is an example of how to   
   criticise properly, sam made his point and left it at that, ie no slap given   
   means no slap back   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)