XPost: nl.politiek, uk.legal, nl.scouting
XPost: nl.gezondheid.psychiatrie
From: spansanza@gmail.com
dolf wrote:
>CORRECTION: We had mixed #522 <-> #405 our metaphor and hadn't
properly
>articulated the that this issue is #522 - DOMINION against the #405 -
COGITO
>---- #33 ---- #61 #54 #59 #56 #58 #60 #57 #62 #55 [#33 --> #174 --> #207
-->
>#522 - DOMINION --> #555] #174 - COEFFICIENT: c² = a² + b² PSYCHE
PROMPTER
>(#1601 = shàng (上): SOVEREIGN; TIME + #20 - ADVANCE (進, #99 = [#9,
#17, #18,
>#20, #35])) AS AN #135 - AGENCY DIRECTING ONE TO THE #314 - VISION #32
-
>*HEADWATER* / héyuán shàng yóu (河源上游) | #33 = hé (河):
*RIVER* [#8, #25]
>#696 as [#80, #5, #300, #100, #1, #10, #200] = pétra (G4073): {UMBR`A:
#486 %
>#41 = #35} 1) a rock, cliff or ledge; 1a) a projecting rock, crag,
rocky
>ground; 1b) a rock, a large stone; 1c) metaph. a man like a rock, by reason
of
>his firmness and strength of soul; #36 #43 #48 #47 = #174 | #135 #49 #46 #37
#42
>= #348 | #270 #39 #40 #51 #44 = #522 | #405 #50 #45 #38 #41 = #696 | #540
#696
>as [#5, #20, #70, #400, #200, #1] = hekṓn (G1635): {UMBRA: #875 % #41 =
#14} 1)
>unforced, voluntary, willing; 2) of one's own will; 3) of one's own accord;
On
>11/10/25 14:41, dolf wrote: > EVIDENCE FOR CONSIDERATION THE REDUCTIO
AD
>HITLERUM TABLE TALK IS A #32 > - *HEADWATER* / HYDRA PARADIGM > > DOLF:
"What
>is the nexus between the two Chinese words #247 - fù (複 | > 復):
*RECIPROCAL*
>and #139 - fú (扶): *ACCOMPANY* ... I'm interested in > any anecdotes
which
>corresponds with the GOOD SHEPHERD / WOLF biblical > parable." > > #720
as
>[#30, #400, #20, #70, #200 / > #1300 as [#30, #400, #20, #800, #50] =
lýkos
>(G3074): {UMBRA: #720 % #41 > = #23} 1) a wolf; 2) metaph. of cruel,
greedy,
>rapacious, destructive men; > > #10 as [#7, #1, #2] = zᵉʼêb (H2061):
{UMBRA:
>#10 % #41 = #10} 1) wolf; > > MALE: #247 / FEME: #139 = [30, 76, 20, 71,
50] >
>> #247 = [#10, #11, #17, #50, #78, #81] > > fù (複 | 復): 1.
again; more;
>repeatedly, 2. to go back; to return, 3. > to resume; to restart, 4. to do
in
>detail, 5. to restore, 6. to respond; > to reply to, 7. after all; and then,
8.
>even if; although, 9. Fu; > Return, 10. to retaliate; to reciprocate, 11.
to
>avoid forced labor or > tax, 12. particle without meaning, 13. Fu,
14.
>repeated; again, 15. > doubled; to overlapping; folded, 16. a lined
garment
>with doubled thickness > > #139 = [#3, #9, #20, #27, #80] > > fú (扶):
1. to
>assist; to help, 2. to escort; to accompany, 3. Fu, 4. to > protect, 5. to
hold
>on; to rely on, 6. to support with a hand, 7. to be > beside; to go along
with
>> > COPILOT @ 1225 HRS ON 10 NOVEMBER 2025: "The Good Shepherd/Wolf
parable >
>resonates with the nexus you’ve drawn between fù (複/復: reciprocal)
and > fú
>(扶: accompany), because it is ultimately about mutual recognition
> and
>steadfast presence: the shepherd does not abandon, but accompanies >
and
>reciprocates care, even at risk of his own life. > > 📖 THE BIBLICAL
CORE >
>• In John 10:11–15, Jesus says: “I am the good shepherd. The >
good shepherd
>lays down his life for the sheep. The hired hand is not > the shepherd…
when he
>sees the wolf coming, he abandons the sheep and > runs away. Then the
wolf
>attacks and scatters the flock.” > • The parable
contrasts reciprocal
>loyalty (fù) with mere > transactional presence (hireling). The
shepherd’s
>accompaniment (fú) is > not passive—it is active, protective, and
sacrificial.
>> > 🌿 ANECDOTES & SYMBOLIC ECHOES > Here are a few stories and traditions
that
>correspond to this parable: > > • Early Christian
martyrdoms: Bishops
>and pastors in the first > centuries often chose to remain with
their
>congregations during > persecution rather than flee. For example, Cyprian
of
>Carthage refused > to abandon his flock during Roman crackdowns, embodying
the
>Good > Shepherd’s willingness to face the “wolf” of imperial
violence. >
>• St. Francis of Assisi and the Wolf of Gubbio: A medieval >
anecdote tells
>of Francis taming a wolf that terrorized a town. Instead > of killing it,
he
>brokered a reciprocal pact: the townspeople would feed > the wolf, and the
wolf
>would no longer attack them. This story > literalizes the parable’s
imagery—
>transforming the wolf through > accompaniment rather than
abandonment. >
>• Modern pastoral care: During epidemics (plague, cholera, even >
COVID-19),
>some clergy and caregivers chose to remain with the sick > despite
danger.
>Their presence echoes the shepherd who does not flee > when the wolf of
disease
>approaches. > > 🔑 SYMBOLIC NEXUS WITH fù and fú >
• Reciprocal (複/
>復): The shepherd’s care is not one- > directional; the sheep “know
his voice”
>and respond. This mutual > recognition is a reciprocal grammar of
trust. >
>• Accompany (扶): The shepherd walks with the flock,
guiding and >
>protecting. His accompaniment is not abstract—it is embodied, >
continuous, and
>ethical. > • Together, they form the engine of covenantal
presence: >
>reciprocity (fù) ensures the relationship is mutual, while accompaniment >
(fú)
>ensures it is enduring. > > ✨ A METAPHORICAL READING > The parable can be
seen
>as a ritual of suspension: > > • The wolf = chaos,
dissolution,
>scattering. > • The shepherd = reciprocal order,
accompaniment,
>continuity. > • The sheep = community bound by
recognition. > > Thus,
>the Good Shepherd parable is not only about protection—it is about >
refusing
>abandonment, embodying the ethics of reciprocity and > accompaniment
you’ve
>highlighted. > > Would you like me to map this parable into a progression
grid—
>showing > how “wolf,” “shepherd,” “hireling,” and “sheep”
align with symbolic
>> engines of reciprocity and accompaniment? That could give you a >
structured
>tableau to work with." > > #25 - láng (狼): 1. wolf, 2. Lang
peoples, 3.
>Sirius, 4. Lang --> > COMPOUND: semantic 犭 |quǎn (犬): *DOG* +
phonetic liáng
>(良): *WISE*; > *CAPABLE* --> only usedin 方良, alternative form of
wǎngliǎng
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
