XPost: nl.politiek, nl.taal, nl.gezondheid.psychiatrie   
   XPost: uk.legal   
   From: spansanza@gmail.com   
      
   dolf wrote:   
      
   >Pancho Sanza wrote:   
   >>dolf wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>CORRECTION:   
   >>>   
   >>>The problem is that this dynamic [... #194 ... #239 ... #459] which   
   >>>intersects to 29 AUGUST is an identified schema (ie. #71 --> #34) mapping   
   >>>ROMAN HETEROS PROTOTYPE #TWO --> LUO SHU (the pattern is precise) BY   
   >>>HITLER's TABLE TALK 1941 / 1994 as #225 / #1771 - REICH EMPIRE ACTION.   
   >>>   
   >>>Europe has a guilt for horrendous sins and that DEPRAVITY is no more   
   >>>manifest than in the conduct of Kees van den Doel   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>Only if you paint Kees van den Doel in a   
   >>different shade of red than your garden fence.   
      
   >The American Revolution had a significant impact on the Dutch Republic. The   
   end   
   >of the eighteenth century was marked by a spirited exchange of ideas on   
   liberty,   
   >political rights and state-building between the two Republics. But it was   
   not   
   >merely ideas which travelled freely. People from both sides of the   
   Atlantic   
   >sailed across the ocean for professional, political, and personal reasons,   
   and   
   >testified to the great revolutionary events that were unfolding at the   
   time.   
   >This led to numerous exchanges between American and Dutch politicians. In   
   this   
   >blog Lauren Lauret focuses on Gijsbert Karel van Hogendorp and Thomas   
   Jefferson.   
   >The Dutch Republic was the first country to acknowledge the independence of   
   the   
   >United States in 1782. An official delegation set sail to Philadelphia    
   the   
   >following year and Van Hogendorp joined them in a military capacity. His   
   journey   
   >was a transatlantic and revolutionary version of the traditional Grand Tour:   
   the   
   >Old World visiting the New. During the trip he wrote an extensive number   
   of   
   >thematic and philosophical letters, now kept by the National Archives of   
   the   
   >Netherlands in The Hague. He would later draw on this material when working   
   on   
   >the new constitution of the Dutch Restoration government in the 1810s. In   
   the   
   >process, Van Hogendorp retained the institutions of the Batavian   
   Revolution,   
   >while providing them with their traditional, prerevolutionary    
   names. A   
   >transatlantic perspective helps us to better understand the    
   pivotal   
   >contributions of both Jefferson and Van Hogendorp to the American and   
   Dutch   
   >constitutions respectively. “The best-informed man of his age I have ever   
   seen”   
   >After meeting Van Hogendorp in Annapolis, where Congress had    
   assembled,   
   >Jefferson recommended him to George Washington “as the best-informed man   
   of his   
   >age I have ever seen.” Of course, Jefferson could not foresee that Van   
   Hogendorp   
   >would later become the main author of the Dutch constitution, but, as he   
   wrote   
   >to the young man, he was much impressed with his abilities: “Your thirst   
   after   
   >knowledge, your capacity to acquire it, your dispositions to apply it to   
   the   
   >good of mankind [..] give your country much to hope from the continuance of   
   your   
   >life.” Such praise no doubt boosted the intellectual ambitions of the   
   twenty-   
   >year old youth who relished the exchange of ideas on government with   
   Jefferson   
   >from the moment they met. At first glance, Jefferson and Van Hogendorp   
   would   
   >appear to be unlikely friends. They occupied opposite ends of the spectrum   
   as   
   >far as fundamental questions were concerned. Jefferson championed    
   popular   
   >sovereignty and individual state power. In contrast, Van Hogendorp believed   
   that   
   >the people should be firmly kept in check and that the limitations on the   
   powers   
   >of Congress were detrimental to the American Republic. Nevertheless,    
   the   
   >exchange of letters set Van Hogendorp’s mind on fire and he bombarded   
   Jefferson   
   >with questions. On reading a draft of Jefferson’s Notes of the State of   
   Virginia   
   >in 1784, he asked a poignant question: “Give me leave to put You in mind   
   of the   
   >articles of Your description of Virginia, which You granted me to have   
   copied. I   
   >should wish to know whether Your Negroes marry, or what proportion do.   
   One   
   >Evening in the Yerseys, riding on very slow on my fatigued horse, I conceived   
   an   
   >idea that gave me great Satisfaction. It leads to develope the history   
   and   
   >destination of man. In consequence of it I have drawn a rough sketch of a   
   system   
   >of Nature, of Society, of Government and of Politics. I am not able now to   
   Send   
   >You a copy, but intend doing it afterwards.” “Study the laws to simplify   
   them” A   
   >central idea running through Van Hogendorp’s notes is the    
   simplicity” of the   
   >American people. This would also become a key term in plans to reform    
   the   
   >government of the Dutch Republic. Van Hogendorp carefully observed how    
   the   
   >Massachusetts legislature went about simplifying the state’s   
   legislation in   
   >December 1783: “Committees do most of the work really, or the main   
   combatants   
   >walk up to each other during a debate and settle the matter. They do not   
   always   
   >turn a committee report into a state law, nevertheless the report    
   is   
   >influential. Several matters are trusted in the hands of committees   
   elected   
   >outside of the assembly: this way the most-esteemed are elected to study   
   the   
   >laws to simplify them. Seventy [bills] were listed, three of those    
   were   
   >presented to the assembly, and all of them spoiled by lucid comments.”   
   According   
   >to Van Hogendorp, public finance was in need of simplification in both the   
   ‘old’   
   >Dutch Republic and the young American Republic. Most Dutch provinces had   
   been   
   >unwilling to adapt their standard contribution to federal expenses    
   when   
   >circumstances changed. In the light of this crucial political problem,    
   Van   
   >Hogendorp was very interested in the design of American financial    
   system.   
   >Jefferson commented on Van Hogendorp’s “short account of the finances   
   of the   
   >United States” and Robert Morris—the initiator of the Bank of   
   North-America—   
   >commented on his note on the “Bank of North-America.” The American   
   states, like   
   >the Dutch provinces, wanted to maintain the quote system, which they regarded   
   as   
   >an essential element of states’ rights. Van Hogendorp was of the opinion   
   that in   
   >doing so the young American Republic ran the risk of making the same mistakes   
   as   
   >his homeland and informed Jefferson accordingly. In his notes, Van   
   Hogendorp   
   >also reflected on the benefits of Dutch-American financial and    
   commercial   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|