home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.books.inklings      Discussing the obscure Oxford book club      1,925 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 1,205 of 1,925   
   Troels Forchhammer to All   
   Re: Thoughts on the Book of Lost Tales   
   09 Jul 09 16:34:02   
   
   7821a053   
   XPost: rec.arts.books.tolkien, alt.fan.tolkien   
   From: Troels@ThisIsFake.invalid   
      
   In message   
   <33de0fc9-2ad4-432a-a82f-d057f557c293@o6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>   
   "Noel Q. von Schneiffel"    
   spoke these staves:   
   >   
   > On 6 Jul., 23:59, Troels Forchhammer    
   > wrote:   
   >>   
      
   Makar and Meássę in _The Book of Lost Tales_   
      
   >> Makar and Meássë with their focus on weapons and battle seem less   
   >> able to provide the plot with twists or momentum (perhaps if   
   >> there had been the same kind of rivalry between them as between   
   >> Ares and Athena Tolkien could have created a plot twist with one   
   >> backing the Orcs and one backing the Gnomes).   
   >   
   > Now that is an interesting line of thought - could Makar and   
   > Meásse (or one of them) have actually ended up as orc gods this   
   > way? It would certainly have helped the orcs gain some   
   > independence from Morgoth and Sauron.   
      
   That could provide an extra ironic twist to the whole thing -- Makar   
   or Meássë trying to ingratiate him- or herself to Melko, but ending   
   up being definitely on the wrong side of Melko because the Orcs   
   started to view them as a competing god, gaining a much unwanted (by   
   Melko) independence from Melko. All of this should, of course, have   
   been triggered by Melko's own attempts to lure the other over to his   
   side.   
      
   > (I hope Bqggz doesn't read this; he'd love this theory.)   
      
   Well, Bqggz is a reasonably intelligent and well-behaved Orc, and I   
   am impressed with your generosity that you let him use your PC (or   
   didn't you know? He is posting from your IP-address), so I am sure   
   that he will be able to deal with it in a civilized manner -- just   
   because he'd love the theory doesn't necessarily mean that he'll go   
   on a blood-letting rampage, does it?   
      
   > I actually liked Makar and Meásse in BoLT, even though they were   
   > never much developed. They were providing a "grey area" between   
   > good and evil - short-tempered, warlike, not very popular, but   
   > still grudgingly accepted in the pantheon of Valinor. I think the   
   > mythology could have benefitted from this. Of course, I see how it   
   > would clash with the Christian good/evil dualism.   
      
   Yes, I also quite liked the idea of their being in the mythology, but   
   I don't think they offered many, if any, routes of development. Not   
   that their unchristian moral mid-tones would have stopped Tolkien in   
   BoLT (though quite possibly it would have meant that they would not   
   have survived into the post-LotR era) -- it is simply, I believe,   
   that they didn't offer the same possibilities for development as the   
   surviving Ainur did. I agree, however, that the mythology would have   
   benefitted from having one or more Valar that could occupy this moral   
   grey-zone.   
      
   --   
   Troels Forchhammer   
   Valid e-mail is    
   Please put [AFT], [RABT] or 'Tolkien' in subject.   
      
       One who cannot cast away a treasure at need is in fetters.   
    - Aragorn "Strider", /Two Towers/ (J.R.R. Tolkien)   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca