XPost: rec.arts.books.tolkien, alt.religion.christian.east-orthodox   
   From: damian@phpexpert.org   
      
   On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 00:41:42 -0500, Larry Swain   
    wrote:   
      
      
   >Ah, and this reveals the logical fallacy under which you are operating.  You   
   equate chivalry with   
   >non-Orthodox theology as if a) it were the only non-Orthodox theology b) as   
   if chivalry were the   
   >seperating point between the Eastern church and the Western and c) and you   
   ask for an anachronistic   
   >reading.  These are all false premises:  there are significant differences   
   between East and West   
   >that makes the West, including the Anglo-Saxons and Irish, unOrthodox, and   
   chivalry certainly wasn't   
   >the sticking point.  One of the sticky points was the phrase in the creed   
   that the Holy Spirit   
   >proceeded from the Father and the Son---a phrase first introduced at the   
   Council of Toledo in the   
   >500s and quickly caught on in the West, never and always rejected in the   
   East....the point of   
   >contention in fac t in 1054.   
   read Revelation both of you and stiop this futile arguing - worry   
   about the future, not the past   
      
   Share Tips from Shabbydabbydoo Shares   
   All Markets covered - www.phpexpert.org/sharetips/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)