Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.books.inklings    |    Discussing the obscure Oxford book club    |    1,925 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,687 of 1,925    |
|    Jerry Friedman to Steve Hayes    |
|    Re: Save the Allegory!    |
|    17 May 16 07:53:01    |
      XPost: alt.books.cs-lewis, rec.arts.books, alt.usage.english       XPost: alt.english.usage, alt.religion.christianity       From: jerry_friedman@yahoo.com              On 5/17/16 2:35 AM, Steve Hayes wrote:       > Save the Allegory!       >       > An entire literary tradition is being forgotten because writers use       > the term allegory to mean, like, whatever they want.       >       > By Laura Miller       >       > I’m not much of a language stickler. I roll my eyes when people argue       > over the Oxford comma, and I couldn’t care less when someone says they       > “could care less.” As a descriptivist (rather than a prescriptivist),       > I’m mostly OK with seeing the meaning of words evolve and transform       > over time, because that’s what a living language does.       ...              Very daring to copy that into a.u.e.              > What people usually mean when they call something an allegory today is       > that the fictional work in question can function as a metaphor for       > some real-world situation or event. This is a common arts journalist’s       > device: finding a political parallel to whatever you happen to be       > reviewing is a handy way to make it appear worth writing about in the       > first place. Calling that parallel an allegory serves to make the       > comparison more forceful. Fusion says that Batman v Superman is a       > “none-too-subtle allegory for the fight between Republican       > presidential hopefuls Donald Trump and Ted Cruz.” (It is not.) The       > Hollywood Reporter calls Zootopia an “accidental anti-Trump       > allegory”—this despite the fact that there is no literary form less       > accidental than allegory. The meaning of the word has drifted so far       > that even works that aren’t especially metaphorical get labeled as       > allegory: A film about artistic repression in Iran is a “clunky       > allegory” for ... artistic repression in Iran.              She's got a point there. I also dislike the idea that calling a fantasy       or science fiction story an allegory makes it respectable somehow.              > Allegory or metaphor: The distinction might seem obscure and academic       > to many readers. Shouldn’t allegory be grateful to get any attention       > at all? Isn’t it just an archaic literary mode that nobody uses       > anymore? Yes and no. About the only people creating true allegories       > today are political cartoonists. But a culture never entirely discards       > its roots, and allegory, which first appeared in the waning years of       > the Roman Empire,              Ahem. See for example Plato's /Republic/, Psalm 80, and Ezekiel 16-17.              > is one of the foundations of Western literature.       ...              See also /Encountering Sorrow/ (/Li Sao/, I'm told), a Chinese classic       of the third century B.C., I'm told.              > See it here:       > https://t.co/kVOkvPEMhH              --       Jerry Friedman       "No Trump" bridge-themed political shirts: cafepress.com/jerrysdesigns       Bumper stickers ditto: cafepress/jerrysstickers              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca