Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.books.inklings    |    Discussing the obscure Oxford book club    |    1,925 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,722 of 1,925    |
|    Steve Hayes to All    |
|    How J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis Revive    |
|    17 Oct 17 05:48:33    |
      XPost: alt.books.cs-lewis, rec.arts.books.tolkien, alt.books.reviews       XPost: rec.arts.books       From: hayesstw@telkomsa.net              Philip and Carol Zaleski’s The Fellowship: The Literary Lives of the       Inklings is a mental map, a religious journey, and the biography of a       brotherhood. Plenty of distinguished Inklings came and went over the       years, padding across the carpets with a Warnie-provided drink in       hand, but the Zaleskis zoom in on (and out from) the primary axis of       Tolkien, Lewis, Williams, and Barfield, the four among whom the       invisible correspondences of thought and affection were strongest.       Christians all, these men formed what the Zaleskis call “a perfect       compass rose of faith”: Barfield the proto–New Ager, Tolkien the       rather prim orthodox Catholic, Lewis the noisy and dogmatically       ordinary layman and popular theologian, Williams the ritualistic       Anglican with a taste for sorcery.              “The qualifications … are a tendency to write, and Christianity.” Thus       explained Lewis in a letter to Williams in March 1936, inviting him to       a session of the “informal club” that had begun convening every       Thursday night in his rooms at Oxford’s Magdalen College (and then       again, still less formally, at the Eagle & Child pub on Tuesday       mornings). The letter was a fan letter; the two men didn’t know each       other, but Lewis had found himself compelled to inform Williams that       reading his fantasy novel The Place of the Lion—in which comfy England       is burst upon by unruly celestial essences—had been “one of the major       literary events of my life.” Lewis was an Oxford fellow and tutor in       English literature, and a relatively fresh-baked believer: after an       arduous wrangle of a conversion, he had arrived at the knowledge of a       personal God while sitting in Warnie’s sidecar on a motorcycle ride to       Whipsnade Zoo. Williams worked in publishing, wrote feverishly, smoked       like a chimney, delivered whirling literary-metaphysical lectures, and       indulged in the overheated cultivation of female disciples. (One such       pupil, we learn from the Zaleskis, was struck smartly on the bottom       with a ruler.) Devoutly churchgoing, he was also of high rank in at       least one esoteric mystical order and would make sacred signs while       traveling on the London Underground. W. H. Auden thought him nearly a       saint. To Lewis’s letter, Williams replied immediately that he had       been on the verge of writing to Lewis, in praise of his The Allegory       of Love. “It has never before happened to me to be admiring an author       of a book while he at the same time was admiring me.” (Not a bad       example of the loopy Williams prose style, that.) The serendipity, the       crossbeams of appreciation, the ardent encounter at the aesthetic,       soon to be spiritual, level—a very Inklings moment.              Read it akll here:              https://t.co/aGb8MX3krA                     --       Steve Hayes       Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm        http://www.goodreads.com/hayesstw        http://www.bookcrossing.com/mybookshelf/Methodius              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca