Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.books.inklings    |    Discussing the obscure Oxford book club    |    1,925 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 525 of 1,925    |
|    Tim Bruening to Steuard Jensen    |
|    Re: OT: Humans in Narnia (was Re: Evil E    |
|    21 Jan 06 14:40:49    |
      XPost: rec.arts.books.tolkien, alt.books.cs-lewis, rec.arts.books       XPost: rec.arts.books.childrens       From: tsbrueni@pop.dcn.davis.ca.us              Steuard Jensen wrote:              > Quoth nystulc@cs.com in article       > <1136955694.102035.8970@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>:       > > Steuard Jensen wrote:       > > > That's one of the things that always feels like an inconsistency       > > > in Narnia to me.       >       > > > /The Silver Chair/ starts out with something of a surprise: when       > > > Eustace and Jill look at the crowd watching Caspian sail away, I       > > > believe that they see that only about 1 in 5 people in the crowd were       > > > human. That's quite a reversal of the massive human majority       > > > suggested by /Prince Caspian/; I guess a whole lot of the Telmarines       > > > must have decided to leave Narnia, and that the Talking Beasts must       > > > have been breeding like rabbits (Talking Rabbits?).       >       > > Why is that a surprise? It is made clear that, though Narnia is       > > properly ruled by human monarch, it is primarily a land of       > > non-humans. At the end of Prince Caspian, this order is restored,       > > and most of the Telmarines are given a new home elsewhere by Aslan.       >       > The surprise is as much that there were so many Talking Beasts again       > as that there were so few humans. In the space of a single human       > lifetime, they'd gone from "practically extinct" to "enormous       > crowds". I find that odd, if not impossible.       >       > As for the humans, /Prince Caspian/ tells us that when the Telmarines       > were given the choice to live with the Talking Beasts or to leave,       > "Some of them, chiefly the young ones" were happy to stay, while "most       > of the older men" wanted to leave. Even then, they were suspicious:       > "more than half of them turned up" to be sent away, but that wording       > implies that something close to half of them stayed anyway. So I       > conclude that maybe 1/3 of the older Telmarines and the vast majority       > of the younger ones decided to stay in Narnia. That's a big       > population drop, but given the demographics they'd probably be close       > to their prior population within a generation.       >       > So somehow, the nearly-full population of Telmarines who had hardly       > even believed in the Talking Beasts anymore (because they'd become so       > rare and hidden) were in the space of a generation outnumbered 5:1.       > That's weird.              Maybe the Talking Beasts have shorter life spans and therefore faster       reproductive cycles than humans.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca