XPost: alt.books.cs-lewis, rec.arts.books.tolkien   
   From: bbwebpage+usenet@gmail.com   
      
   John W. Kennedy (jwkenne@attglobal.net) wrote:   
      
   > stephen@nomail.com wrote:   
   >> John W. Kennedy  wrote:   
   >>> stephen@nomail.com wrote:   
   >>>> John W. Kennedy  wrote:   
   >>>>> stephen@nomail.com wrote:   
   >>>>>> John W. Kennedy  wrote:   
   >>>>>>> darylgene@aol.com wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> I would simply say,   
   >>>>>>>> again, that if the concept of God has any referent it must   
   >>>>>>>> have boundries. Unless you think everyone worships the same   
   >>>>>>>> God you have to make distinctions. If a person is a   
   >>>>>>>> Christian, no matter what they believe, just because they   
   >>>>>>>> say they are, the term is meaningless, no?   
   >>>>>>> I quite agree that I would be happy if such devil worshipers   
   >>>>>>> as Pat Robertson and George W. Bush would stop calling   
   >>>>>>> themselves "Christian", but it remains the case that if you   
   >>>>>>> deny that Jews worship the same God that Christians do, your   
   >>>>>>> /own/ Christianity is put into serious doubt, "for Salvation   
   >>>>>>> is of the Jews".   
   >>>>>> How exactly have you concluded that Pat Robertson and George   
   >>>>>> W. Bush are devil worshipers?  They seem to believe that they   
   >>>>>> are worshiping the God of the Bible.  Do you think that they   
   >>>>>> secretly address their prayers to Satan?  Or do you think   
   >>>>>> that despite their belief that they are worshiping the   
   >>>>>> Christian/Jewish/Muslim God that their actions indicate they   
   >>>>>> are mistaken, and are instead worshiping something else?   
   >>>>> Tashlan. They have their reward.   
   >>>> That does not really answer the question.  Do you think   
   >>>> Robertson and Bush think they are worshipping the   
   >>>> Christian/Jewish/Muslim God, or do you think they think they   
   >>>> are worshipping the Devil?   
   >>   
   >>> I suppose that depends on what you mean by "think". There can be   
   >>> no serious doubt that Robertson believes that he is, in some   
   >>> sense of historic continuity, a Christian, but the   
   >>> evil-twin-of-Santa-Claus that he has in mind when he says "God"   
   >>> can hardly be reconciled with that.   
   >>   
   >> And some people cannot reconcile the God Muslim's apparently have   
   >> in mind with the Christian God they have in mind.  Why are you   
   >> right about Robertson and his "God", but those others are wrong   
   >> about Islam and the Christian God?   
   >   
   > Because Moslems are a group of many, many diverse persons, some   
   > wicked, some good, and some indifferent, and God only knows what   
   > is in each one's heart, whereas Robertson and Bush are individuals   
   > who have made their servitude to Hell quite clear.   
   >   
   >    "Noi siam venuti al loco ov'i' t'ho detto   
   >       che tu vedrai le genti dolorose   
   >     c'hanno perduto il ben de l'intelletto."   
   >   
   >   
   >   
      
   That's fine, and it's a logically consistent answer. I'm not sure I   
   agree, but I understand. What puzzles me is this. Maybe I lost track,   
   but weren't you one of the ones who said my position was logically   
   impossible because Muslims claim to worship the God who appeared to   
   Abraham? But it seems you're willing to admit the validity of a   
   distinction between the God a man claims to worship and the God he   
   actually worships. Right?   
      
   So our disagreement is over whether that distinction applies to   
   Muslims, not over whether my position is logically possible. Does   
   that make sense?   
      
   --   
   Bill Baldwin   
   http://bettercovenant.wordpress.com/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)