home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.books.inklings      Discussing the obscure Oxford book club      1,925 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 993 of 1,925   
   Dan Drake to AJA   
   Re: C.S. Lewis: enemy of the Golden Rule   
   27 Nov 07 01:16:43   
   
   XPost: alt.books.cs-lewis   
   From: dd@dandrake.com   
      
   On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 14:22:43 UTC, "AJA"  wrote:   
      
   >   
   > > Did he ever express any views on the Spanish Civil War, 1936?   
   > Very few references exist in print about political situations of his day, I   
   > find.  He barely mentions The Troubles, and mentions the World Wars only to   
   > illustrate various points.  Again some digging is necessary here.   
      
   He was, as you say, apolitical and/or anti-political, and Doug Gresham has   
   cited some really remarkable bit of unawareness of world news, which of   
   course I can't call to mind now.   
      
   Oddly enough, we have one scrap of evidence of his reaction to the Spanish   
   Civil War: he was on some occasion upset at atrocities committed by   
   Franco's forces, and  Tolkien considered this another sign of Lewis's   
   Irish Protestant susceptibility to anti-Catholic propaganda. We have no   
   information, I think, on what the story was; but in light of historical   
   data, there's no reason to _assume_ that the story was false. In any case,   
   Lewis had rather strong feelings about murdering defenceless people on any   
   side, in any cause.   
      
   (It's hardly necessary to get into details here (disclosure: I have family   
   connections to that war); but certainly there were atrocities, in which   
   class lots of people at the time included the well documented (and how!)   
   attack on Guernica; and certainly there was enough evil on both sides to   
   go around.)   
      
   But darn it, I will go on: One side was backed by Hitler and one side by   
   Stalin. One of the most famous participants was on the side backed by   
   Stalin and wrote an expose' of how it was abused by Stalin, followed by   
   the classic tract (2 of them) on the evils of the Soviet system. I'd say   
   it is not easy to draw firm conclusions about a person from which side he   
   was on.   
      
      
   --   
   Dan Drake   
   dd@dandrake.com   
   http://www.dandrake.com/   
   porlockjr.blogspot.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca