XPost: alt.christnet.christnews, alt.bible   
   From: .robert@mu.way   
      
   On Oct 11, 2025, James wrote   
   (Message-ID:):   
      
   > On Thu, 09 Oct 2025 09:42:32 -0700, Robert<.robert@mu.way>  wrote:   
   >   
   > > On Oct 9, 2025, James wrote   
   > > (Message-ID:):   
   > >   
   > > > Those uninspired writings are misleading you. My Scriptural INSPIRED   
   > > > writings (2 Tim 3:16) use the word "staurus" in the 1st century.   
      
   2Ti 3:16   
      
   16 All Scripture is God-breathed and profitable for doctrine, for reproof,   
   for correction, for instruction in righteousness,   
      
   It is pointedly obvious that the word *cross* is not in that verse.   
      
   > >   
   > > Prove that it is not stauroo that was used.   
   >   
   > Sure: But I misspelled it above. I did "rus" when it should have been   
   > "ros".   
      
   That had very little to do with my question, so why did you ignore the   
   question?   
      
   >   
   > "Strong's Ref. # 4716   
   >   
   > Romanized stauros   
   > Pronounced stow-ros'   
      
   Look up “stauroo”. See what it means. Big Hint G4717   
      
   Don’t be blinded by the WatchTower.   
   >   
   >   
   > Sincerely James   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)