Just a sample of the Echomail archive
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]
|  Message 660  |
|  August Abolins to mark lewis  |
|  Issues!! :(  |
|  05 Apr 20 12:35:00  |
 
MSGID: 2:221/1.58@fidonet e321c7fe
REPLY: 62.fido-aftersho@1:3634/12 22ef290d
PID: OpenXP/5.0.43 (Win32)
CHRS: ASCII 1
TZUTC: -0400
Hello mark!
** 05.04.20 - 11:01, mark lewis wrote to Benny Pedersen:
ml> Re: Issues!! :(
ml> By: Benny Pedersen to Ward Dossche on Sun Apr 05 2020 03:09:30
BP>> 30 Jul 2019 09:16, Ward Dossche wrote to Charles Stephenson:
ml> ^^^^^^^^^^^
WD>>> But I'm on the road now.
BP>> drive safely, you are not on a ship with autopilot
ml>necropost much? ;)
^^^^^^^^^
Is that a real fidonet term? :) Can you cite a reference? LOL
Any, it made me laugh a bit.
At what point is a reply considered to fall into the "necro" category?
The nature of echomail doesn't really require a specific name for "To:",
so a reply (or rather, any reply/post) at any time should be welcome, not
ostracized - especially in these days of seemingly low traffic in select
echos.
I still have messages that I've tagged for possible/future replies, but
just haven't gotten a round-to-it.
../|ug
--- OpenXP 5.0.43
* Origin: /|ug's Point, Ont. CANADA (2:221/1.58)
SEEN-BY: 1/123 90/1 221/1 6 360 226/30 227/114 229/426 1014 230/0
SEEN-BY: 240/1120 1634 5138 5832 5853 8001 8002 8005 249/206 317 261/38
SEEN-BY: 280/5003 292/854 303/0 310/31 313/41 317/3 320/219 322/757
SEEN-BY: 335/364 342/200 423/81 633/280 2454/119 5020/1042
PATH: 221/1 240/1120 5832 229/426
|
[ << oldest | < older | list | newer > | newest >> ]