From: subc@seereplyto.hdr   
      
   Daemon wrote:   
      
   > Yes, my full intention is to do what I feel is correct, and not to   
   > follow a cult or group of any nature...   
   >   
   >   
   > No, I have no relation or control for that method in the mail   
   > headers, meaning, I can not contribute to X-No-Archive, however, I   
   > will investigate that method, and for see if my client infact   
   > supports that method, and determin wether or not it is nessicary.   
   > I would have thought that a varible such as that would have been   
   > set to no, but some programmers have their own methods I suppose.   
      
   You really don't have a clue do you.  The X-No-Archive header STOPS   
   messages from being archived forever on places like Google groups.   
   When someone posts with 'X-No-Archive: yes' in their message headers   
   or (sometimes) on the first line of the message, that message is NOT   
   archived.  When someone like you then comes and quotes the entire   
   message and DOESN'T use X-No-Archive, that reply is archived with the   
   original mesage inside it.  Do you get it now?  Just think, that last   
   paragraph of your message archived forever for all to see.  If you   
   don't want to use x-no then don't fullquote the messages of people   
   that do use it.   
      
   --   
   subc   
      
   BTW, Thunderbird does indeed support that method and therefore you   
   certainly can add that line to your headers.  If you need to know how   
   to do that, Google has many places for that information.  You do know   
   how to use Google don't you?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)