From: n1etvrandernnietheusingroepen@getthepowerpil.invalid   
      
   "tester"  schreef in bericht   
   news:du1Mk.20977$4u2.10408@newsfe01.iad...   
   > On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:42:08 +0200, Pac Man  wrote:   
   >   
   >> "Auric__"  schreef in bericht   
   >> news:Xns9B3F624C01FC2auricauricauricauric@85.214.105.209...   
   >>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:48:10 GMT, Pac Man  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> 217.78.243.53   
   >>>   
   >>> For those who might care, that redirects to chatten.nl.   
   >>>   
   >>>> Please show them why you have to be friendly against a hacker.   
   >>>   
   >>> 1) No.   
   >>> 2) If you want it done, do it your own damn self. 3) "Hacking"   
   >>> activities of the kind you probably want are ***ILLEGAL*** in many   
   >>> places.   
   >>> 4) Idiots like you are why "hacker" is considered a bad word. 5) Re:   
   >>> your subject, *most* sites aren't very "hacker"-friendly.   
   >>>   
   >>> --   
   >>> P.S. I hope you get cancer.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> If you go and chat over there, you would know what i am talking about   
   >> before making assumptions like this.   
   >> Goodbye for now. They "chatten.nl" personally attack people when   
   >> chatting there.   
   >> So please go and play somewhere else, if you want to do yourself a   
   >> favour.   
   >   
   >   
   > Like AURIC responded before myself- If the site is lame, it is lame.   
   > Don't use that site. If you want to chat freely, try certain places on   
   > IRC. Not every IRC server is for chatting, and you should realize that   
   > before you start asking questions in just "any ol' IRC chat room". It has   
   > rules just like how USENET has rules.   
   >   
   >   
   > --   
   > "Teach me, I learn & retain!"   
      
   That's correct. And your answer is a better one than auric's answer.   
   Friendly greetz   
   Wim   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)