From: n1etvrandernnietheusingroepen@getthepowerpil.invalid
"Auric__" schreef in bericht
news:Xns9B407F08C690Cauricauricauricauric@85.214.105.209...
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:54:13 GMT, Pac Man © wrote:
>
>> "Auric__" schreef in bericht
>> news:Xns9B40716D11BD5auricauricauricauric@85.214.105.209...
>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:13:19 GMT, Pac Man © wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Auric__" schreef in bericht
>>>> news:Xns9B404D18CDF90auricauricauricauric@85.214.105.209...
>>>>> On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:42:08 GMT, Pac Man © wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So please go and play somewhere else, if you want to do yourself a
>>>>>> favour.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been in this group for several years. I think I'll stay.
>>>>
>>>> That's not what i ment. I ment go play somewhere else then on
>>>> "chatten.nl" I didn't say you aren't welcome here.
>>>
>>> I *know* I am. I'm the only reg who still posts.
>>>
>>>> I just said these people on "chatten.nl" are not people who understand
>>>> the meaning of a true hacker in the right sense of the word. They are
>>>> much too scared and act like wild men who escapes a psychiatric
>>>> institute.
>>>
>>> So? Who cares? Again, if you don't like it, LEAVE.
>>>
>>>> They need to be punished for that.
>>>
>>> Punished? For believing what the mass media tells them? So... you wanna
>>> punish the other 6 billion people on this planet, as well?
>>
>> Well, no.
>> It's just those one of those days when you come on some place
>> -unsuspected- that you didn't expect people to become hostile against
>> certain other groups,and you discover otherwise. Nothing more.
>
> Then you have entirely too much faith in humanity.
>
> And let me add that unless they have done something ILLEGAL, there is no
> call for "punishment". (IF they *have* done something illegal, contact the
> police, and have your proof ready.)
>
>> If it was to harras hackers, this message wouldn't be here.
>> Just sense the true meaning of these words. They should NOT harras
>> hackers. Why? Because it's NOT wise to do so. It's NO excuse to
>> interpret hacking the wrong way (which we all hate, me inclusive)
>
> And yet *you* seem to be interpreting it the wrong way. Read the Jargon
> File's definition of a hacker [1], and maybe some of ESR's other docs [2].
>
> What *exactly* do you want done? A "real hacker" would simply not go to
> that site, or might post a statement clarifying what being a hacker is
> really about. Period. If the site is doing something outright illegal *in
> their own jurisdiction*, then a complaint to their provider and/or their
> local police might be in order -- but remember, this is *THE INTERNET*.
> Most people have the right to speak their minds and not worry about
> censorship. (For example, under my real name, I have a web page that is
> *EXTREMELY* offensive to certain rap fans, on purpose. Am I worried about
> being censored? No, because despite having several complaints filed
> against
> me, and being turned off twice, I've done nothing even remotely wrong, and
> I always come out smelling like a rose. Or a rose-scented bastard,
> anyway.)
>
> [1] http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/H/hacker.html
> [2] http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/
>
> --
> If it requires a "C:" drive and it's not called "DOS",
> then I don't need it.
LOL :))))
I like your advice, ofcourse it's possible to do not go there. I found
another and far more excellent option. I joined IRC (Internet Relay Chat)
which gives you far more control about who you want to block and who you
don't. We (me and my neighbour) deleted both accounts on that site. We never
go there again. I wouldn't be surprised if some day some script kiddy would
deface that site :) KIDDO'S
Greetz
Wim
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
