From: tester@fake.email.com   
      
   On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:50:39 +0000, Auric__ wrote:   
      
   > On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:38:20 GMT, MindFever wrote:   
   >   
   >> "Auric__"  wrote in message   
   >> news:Xns9B3F624C01FC2auricauricauricauric@85.214.105.209...   
   >>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 12:48:10 GMT, Pac Man  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> 217.78.243.53   
   >>>   
   >>> For those who might care, that redirects to chatten.nl.   
   >>>   
   >>>> Please show them why you have to be friendly against a hacker.   
   >>>   
   >>> 1) No.   
   >>> 2) If you want it done, do it your own damn self. 3) "Hacking"   
   >>> activities of the kind you probably want are ***ILLEGAL*** in many   
   >>> places.   
   >>> 4) Idiots like you are why "hacker" is considered a bad word. 5) Re:   
   >>> your subject, *most* sites aren't very "hacker"-friendly.   
   >>   
   >> So when YOU hack,its LEGAL because you are doing a favour to humanity?   
   >> this is funny   
   >   
   > When did I claim to "hack"? For that matter, what definition of   
   > "hacking"?   
      
   ROFL, that guy read one message, & replied.   
   [Internets,LOL]   
   THERES A WHOLE LOT MSG IN THRAD!   
   THRAD THRAD IS THRAD THRAD.   
   [/Internets,LOL]   
      
   --   
   "Teach me, I learn & retain!"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)