From: mars1933@hotmail.com   
      
   On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 13:17:09 -0400, "Freedom Man"   
    wrote:   
      
      
   >So Nixon's crimes differed from Bush's - both are still criminals - and   
   >murderers.   
      
   Bush is a murderer. Haven't heard anything like that about Nixon,   
   whose main crime was telling the truth about Jews controlling the   
   media.   
      
   Report of Former Vice President Spiro Agnew   
      
   "The people who own and manage national impact media are Jewish and,   
   with other influential Jews, helped create a disastrous U.S. Mideast   
   policy. All you have to do is check the real policy makers and owners   
   and you find a much higher concentration of Jewish people than you're   
   going to find in the population. By national impact media I am   
   referring to the major news wire services, pollsters, Time and   
   Newsweek Magazines, the New York Times, Washington Post, and the   
   International Herald Tribune. For example, CBS' Mr. (William) Paley's   
   Jewish. Mr. Julian Goodman, who runs NBC, and there's a Leonard   
   Goldenson at ABC. Mrs. Katherine Graham owns the Washington Post and   
   Mr. Sulzberger the New York Times. They are all Jews!   
      
   You go down the line in that fashion...not just with ownership but go   
   down to the managing posts and discretionary posts... and you'll find   
   that through their aggressiveness and their inventiveness, they now   
   dominate the news media. Not only in the media, but in academic   
   communities, the financial communities, in the foundations, in all   
   sorts of highly visible and influential services that involve the   
   public, they now have a tremendous voice.   
      
   Our policy in the Middle East in my judgment is disastrous, because   
   it's not even handed. I see no reason why nearly half the foreign aid   
   this nation has to give goes to Israel, except for the influence of   
   this Zionist lobby. I think the power of the news media is in the   
   hands of a few people...it's not subject to control of the voters,   
   it's subject only to the whim of the board of directors." (Former Vice   
   President Spiro Agnew)   
      
      
   >I agree about Israel.   
      
      
   >What's in a name? If the goal is the subordination and suppression of   
   >non-whites, that is simply wrong,   
      
   No one has such a goal.   
      
   > as it unjustly punishes the good people   
   >among these groups.   
      
   Such groups are a figment of your imagination.   
      
   >I could only accept that idea if it meant separate but equal.   
      
   We should have a nation for White people, that is what separate means.   
      
   > However, it   
   >never works out that way. A condition of emnity always results when people   
   >are segregated.   
      
   A line from a Star Trek show goes:   
   So we offend you by our will to survive do we?   
      
   >They were treated well for public relations purposes perhaps, but how would   
   >they be treated if they moved in?   
      
   They should not move in.   
      
   >Superficial skin color is NOT the best criteria for dividing people, if   
   >division is beneficial at all - which I believe it is not.   
      
      
       Here is part of David Duke's newsletter:   
      
       "Entering my old neighborhood of Gentilly Woods in New Orleans had   
   a profound effect upon me. My once tidy and well-kept neighborhood was   
   now mostly Black and disheveled. It once sported many homes that   
   seemed to always have a fresh-painted look. Now they were adorned with   
   peeling paint an unkempt lawns of weeds and trash. In talking to some   
   old holdouts in the neighborhood, they told me that the once rare   
   burglary, vandalism and assault had now become commonplace. The   
   diehard White remnants who remained had adapted to the changes and   
   found a way to endure each indignity and violation the best they   
   could. The change had been so gradual that they were no longer shocked   
   by new instances of crime, just resigned to them.   
      
        "The streets had scattered groups of hard-featured Black men   
   standing around dilapidated cars giving hostile stares to an obviously   
   unknown White person trespassing in their neighborhood.   
      
         "Even though it had been many  years since my last visit, my   
   memories became more vivid as I entered the boundaries of the   
   neighborhood. It seemed as though I had only been away a few scant   
   hours. Now those memories crashed against the images of the present   
   causing me to feel off balance. It was akin to visiting a healthy   
   friend and then after a few short weeks to see him wasting away with   
   cancer. Afraid that perhaps me recollection was more idealized than it   
   really was--as soon as I returned home, I ferreted out my old   
   photographs.   
      
        "Those photos clearly portrayed a community even more attractive   
   than I had remembered. Well-kept homes filled the album, often   
   accented with blooming flowers and finely trimmed shrubbery, sidewalks   
   edged closely, and many homes had a fresh paint look. Polished autos   
   dotted the clean streets. Even more dramatic were the Tom Sawyer and   
   Becky Thatcher-like bright faces of the children with whom I spent so   
   many happy hours of childhood.   
      
        "In my time they were the ruddy faces that filled our streets   
   yards and parks. They were all gone now, replaced by dark, angry   
   teenagers, with scarred skin and boomboxes; often with pistols and   
   crack in their pockets, menacing the streets where children now fear   
   to venture. A picture repeated, I believe, all over the United States   
   of America. For the current White residents of Gentilly Woods their   
   story is much like the story for the frog that is put in a pot  of   
   warm water while the temperature is slowly increased until the poor   
   creature is boiling and it is too late to save itself. Is the   
   traditional American already too lulled by the tepid water to realize   
   what is ahead?   
      
         "Amercians can glimpse the future in the inner cities of   
   America. The political corruption, failing schools, drug problems,   
   crime, the run down housing and even the trash in the streets- all   
   hold a preview of the coming attractions of 21st century America. When   
   all of America is of the same racial proportion as that of the inner   
   cities, there will be no White infrastructure, and no white cornucopia   
   of tax revenue mitigating the Third Worldism. Criminals will no longer   
   be held in check by White police, prosecutors, juries and judges. The   
   shrinking White tax base will be inadequate to the costs of the   
   criminal justice system and jails needed to house lawbreakers. The   
   housing, food, medical care, and schooling of those who cannot provide   
   their own--will no longer be able to live off the support of the aging   
   and diminishing European population."   
      
      
         The address for this newsletter is David Duke Report, Box 88,   
   Covington, LA 70434   
   http://www.duke.org   
      
      
   >Would you consider China third world?   
      
       The former White nations and Japan are the first world. The Black   
   nations and India are the third world. In the middle, or the second   
   world are the Arabs and China. It is just as racialists would predict.   
   It is because the White race is on average much more intelligent than   
   the Black race. The people in Japan are much lighter in color than the   
   people in India.   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)