Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.activism    |    General non-specific activism discussion    |    157,361 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 155,642 of 157,361    |
|    Dipak De to All    |
|    ETHNICITY OF GORKHAS HAS NOT ESTABLISHED    |
|    15 Apr 15 00:58:38    |
      From: dipakde27@gmail.com               ETHNICITY OF GORKHAS HAS NOT ESTABLISHED              - DIPAK DE [HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVIST; M. PHIL IN HUMAN RIGHTS]                While Darjeeling became the wreckers' ball, Nepal       has become a viable, vibrant space of thinking, learning and searching the way       for development. Nepalese of Darjeeling have not dumbed down the       pre-independent philosophy and        tactics to wrest-away Darjeeling from not only from Bengal but also from       India. Nepalese leaders of Darjeeling behaving and uttering in such a way that       they are the locum tenens of past leaders but in post-independent India there       is no such locus standi        and as a result the fidelity and integrity of the Nepalese of Darjeeling are       in question. In addition there is no raison d'etre of Gorkha ethnicity and in       spite of that in the unconstitutional tripartite agreement in 2011 for the       creation of Gorkhaland        Territorial Administration [GTA], the sentence "the ethnicity of Gorkhas       established" inserted in the development paragraph. News appeared on 30th       January, 2015 that Subash Ghisingh, the president of Gorkha National       Liberation Front, died on 29th January,        2015. He was in exile, far away from the kingdom [Darjeeling hills] that had       once been his and that he had lost to a one time vassal. Like King, he said       the last word; similarly his former trusted aide Bimal Gurung is at present,       saying the last word in        Darjeeling hills. But in death, he may be luckier than his wife, who was       denied the privilege of having her last rites performed back at her long-lost       home in the hills. What happens in Darjeeling reverberates far beyond those       hills. The echoes,        political and strategic, travel to Nepal, Sikkim and Bhutan, Tibet and also to       the distant capital cities of Delhi and Beijing. Ghisingh's struggle for       Gorkhaland [at first for independent country, thereafter separate state] was a       very different affair,        not just because of the scale of its violence, but also because it was seen by       many in Delhi as a Himalayan conspiracy for a Greater Nepal, which aimed at       creating a confederation of mountain kingdoms and states away from India's       control. Ghisingh        himself added much to the making of the conspiracy. He talked of historical       wrongs committed in the region and wanted to rewrite its history. He raised       the issue of the legality of the Sugouli Treaty of 1815 between East India       Company and Nepal and of        India's treaties with Nepal and Bhutan. John Whelpton in his book 'A History       of Nepal' writes, From 1986 to 1988, a violent campaign was conducted by the       some of the Nepali-speaking majority in Darjeeling .......The leaders of the       agitation eventually        settled for limited autonomy while still remaining part of West Bengal, and       the central government had seemed at times almost to welcome the movement as a       tool to be used against the Communist Party of India (Marxist) administration       in Calcutta. However,        the whole episode raised suspicion in Indian minds that some Nepalese still       nursed the dream of a 'Greater Nepal' reaching all along the Eastern       Himalayas. This was so even though the Gorkhaland activists themselves       stressed that they wanted recognition        as a community within India, not closer links with Nepal itself.               Indians of Nepalese Origin or the Nepamul Bharatiya       feel handicapped, as their name, is willy-nilly associated with and tagged to       another sovereign state, Nepal. The very nomenclature of the community creates       confusion even among        them and their neighbours. They are invariably accused of being Nepalese, the       citizens of Nepal, who are then charged to be usurping rights and privileges       meant for the bonafide Indians. The protestations that they have been living       in India for        generations and were born and brought up in India are not taken        eriously........From the second quarter of nineteenth century, the British       opened up Darjeeling, Sikkim, Duars, and Assam for the Nepalese settlement.       That was the beginning of an organized        colonization and extensive presence of the Nepalese in certain pockets of       Northeast India. Precisely after the Anglo-Burmese War of 1826 Nepalese did       come as soldiers of fortune to begin with and their settlement could be       located on strategically        significant landmarks around British settlements and army cantonments. The       second set of immigrants were the herdsmen, graziers, cattle rearing,       dairymen, lumber jacks and other sundry men, who could not be employed in the       armed forces. Nepalese were the        favoured ethnic stock of the white colonial rulers. Willy-nilly, they came to       be identified as the 'sahibs' faithful boys. Indian Nepalese have struggled to       forge an identity for themselves that distinguishes them from the Nepalese of       Nepal, so that they        might emerge as a distinct ethnic group within India - writes a Nepali       intellectual Awadesh Coomer Sinha, retired as Professor of Sociology from       North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. Nepalese of Darjeeling and adjoining       areas, after elapse of 'Gurkha'        word magic when their beloved masters British colonials [till date they are       carrying this feeling in their inner-heart], efforts made in the past to coin       terms describing Bhargoli, Bharpali, Bhopali, Nepamul, Gorkhali and Gorkha. At       last since 1980s the        term 'Gorkha' has been successful but not with the same interpretation of       'Gurkha'. In British era Gurkha was not any race, community, ethnic/tribal       group connotation. In "Concise History of Darjeeling District Since 1835" by       E.C. Dozey, mentioned that        Gurkha does not mean a race. In 1920, we had 10 Gurkha regiments of 2       battalions each. He wrote - every work on the subject to be found in private       as well as public libraries in Darjeeling, Calcutta and even the British       Museum has, during the past five        years, been referred to in order that each even and project which had       contributed to the growth and prosperity of Darjeeling should find a place in       this record.                      [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca