From: mars1933@hotmail.com   
      
   From The Council of Conservative Citizens:   
      
   One of the most important aspects of 20th century politics has been   
   the almost complete surrender by people of European background of   
   their economic position and social status within their traditional   
   living spaces of Europe and North America. As an example, during the   
   so called "civil rights" movement era, the ability of people of   
   European background to decide who they want to associate with was   
   taken away by all three branches of the federal government in less   
   than 10 years. The Supreme Court Case Brown vs. Board of Education   
   forced white people to send their children to black areas with   
   increased levels of crime as of 1964 outlawed the ability of people of   
   European background to express any preference for members of their   
   group in hiring decisions. With the exception of whites in the South,   
   there was relatively little resistance by most white Americans to the   
   liberal agenda.   
      
   The lack of resistance by white Americans to their decline in social   
   status and economic position has many complicated causes. It can   
   partly be attributed to the flawed nature of our own social heritage.   
   Christianity and liberalism both claim to be universal ideologies.   
   They both claim that all human beings are of equal moral worth and   
   that the ideal for politics is a cosmopolitan political community, in   
   which everyone is a full and equal citizen regardless of their racial   
   or cultural background. These ideologies undermine the ability of   
   people of European background to develop for themselves the belief   
   that it is a legitimate act for whites to favor members of their own   
   group.   
      
   The lack of resistance by white Americans to the decline of their   
   social status and economic position within their traditional homelands   
   can also be attributed to the Cultural Marxists of the Frankfurt   
   School. These people as well forced white people to accept blacks   
   moving into their neighborhoods. By treating Western Culture as an   
   ideology whose only purpose is to justify the oppression and   
   exploitation of non-whites, the Cultural Marxists have been able to   
   undermine any sense of exceptionalism that people of European   
   background have about themselves. This is why there is nothing more   
   hateful than a white liberal. These people hate themselves and their   
   own civilization.   
      
    Since people of European background have no sense of exceptionalism   
   and no sense that it is a legitimate act for them to prefer members of   
   their own social group, the "concept of "white privilege" dominates   
   the political discourse on race in the United States and every other   
   Western nation. This is largely due to the fact that liberals dominate   
   the opinion forming institutions of Western societies such as the   
   universities and the media. Liberals are able to impose an   
   interpretation of public policy issues and political conflicts on   
   society that reflects their values and their assumptions about the   
   social world. This has allowed modern liberalism to attain the status   
   of a hegemonic ideology within the West. Central to modern   
   liberalism's worldview is a radical egalitarian ideology that claims   
   that all human beings are mechanically equal. Liberals want to pretend   
   that it is only environmental factors that influence people's   
   behavior. Therefore, liberals claim that all of the accomplishments of   
   white Americans are illegitimate because they are due to some unfair   
   advantage such as slavery or segregation. This allows liberals to   
   claim without any opposition that any disparity in achievement between   
   whites and other groups must be due to "structural racism." Since   
   liberals monopolize the opinion forming institutions of society, they   
   do not have to entertain other explanations for why there is a   
   disparity in accomplishments between whites and others such as a   
   hereditary component to cognitive mental ability. They can claim that   
   the only acceptable opinion requires compensatory education and other   
   redistributionist social policies until equality of outcome is   
   achieved. The fact that this involves discrimination against white   
   people is barely addressed in our media.   
      
   Although the so called "civil rights" movement was able to   
   successfully take away white people's freedom of association, liberals   
   were not satisfied with the damage that they had done to the United   
   States. In a short period of time liberals began to change their   
   focus. Liberals began to support racial classifications as long as the   
   racial classification worked against white people. Like the pigs in   
   Orwell's animal farm claiming that all animals are equal but some are   
   more equal than others, liberals began to claim that in order to treat   
   everyone equally, blacks must be given preferential treatment. Then   
   liberals wanted to use the coercive apparatus of the welfare state to   
   undermine the social status and economic position of white Americans   
   even further. One of the policies that liberals used to accomplish   
   this goal was affirmative action. Liberals began to develop policies   
   that favored blacks in employment and educational opportunities at the   
   expense of more qualified white people almost as soon as the 1964   
   Civil Rights Bill was passed. Presidents Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson   
   issued executive orders requiring quotas in hiring minorities in order   
   for private contractors to get government contracts. The Supreme Court   
   in a variety of cases has interpreted the Constitution and the Civil   
   Rights Act of 1964 in a manner that allows the government to   
   discriminate against white people and use affirmative action as an   
   entitlement program. However, because liberals still control the   
   opinion forming institutions of society, even when they are   
   discriminating against white people, liberals are still able to create   
   an interpretation of the social world that prevents people from seeing   
   their real agenda.   
      
   The 1971 Supreme Court case, Griggs Vs Duke Power Company, is an   
   example of how liberals rig the system to make it easy for minorities   
   to sue for discrimination. In this case, the Supreme Court   
   reinterpreted Title VII of the Civil Rights act to mean that anytime   
   that there are disparities in outcome between blacks and whites, it   
   must be evidence of discrimination against black people. In this case   
   a power company set certain standards for being employed at the   
   nuclear power plant such as requiring janitors to have a high school   
   education. However, the Supreme Court ruled that this violated Title   
   VII of the Civil Rights act of 1964 because requiring a high school   
   diploma for janitors had an adverse impact on blacks being hired   
   within the power plant. This is the legal doctrine of disparate   
   impact. It assigns responsibility on the employer to prove that they   
   are not guilty of discrimination, if there is a disparity in outcomes   
   between different racial groups in society. To infer evidence of   
   discrimination from unequal group outcomes, the EEOC uses employment   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)