XPost: alt.california, ca.politics, talk.politics.misc
XPost: talk.politics.guns, soc.rights.human
From: LaLaLaLaLaLa@philhendrie.con
On 7/17/2015 8:18 PM, Steve Hayes wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:39:57 -0700, Rudy Canoza
> wrote:
>
>> On 7/17/2015 2:26 PM, Siri Cruz wrote:
>>> In article <52kiqahl1d7im8i09ovcsoeo1ouhor6il0@4ax.com>,
>>> Steve Hayes wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:16:11 -0700, Guy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Like religion or race, sexuality is a fundamental right of all humankind.
>>>>
>>>> Whatever that means.
>>>
>>> That you shouldn't be discriminated against simply because you're gay /
straight
>>> / lesbian / bi / a / whatever.
>>
>> No, that's not what it means, fuckwit. Your fellow fuckwit, gooey, is
>> saying something much stronger than that. He's saying you don't have a
>> right to hold negative opinions of queers and other deviants and science
>> projects. That is, he wants to criminalize thought, just as all
>> intolerant leftists do.
>
> It's a meaningless statement.
>
> What does it mean to say that everyone has a right to a race?
>
> "Race" is an arbitrary concept, and many people have such mexed
> ancestry that they have no way of determining what race they are
> supposed to belong to, so how can you say that race is a "right"?
>
> "Sexuality" is likewise an arbitrary concept that keeps changing all
> the time. How can you say that people have a "right" to something so
> nebulous?
What the fuckwit, gooey, meant was that one has a "right" to a
sexual "identity." He further meant that all of us are obliged to
"respect" that so-called "identity." So, if Bruce Jenner - with an X
and Y chromosome, and having spent the first 65 or so years of his life
as a male - suddenly decides to declare himself a "woman", gooey
believes we are all obliged to consider it to be a woman.
That's obviously bullshit.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
