Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.activism    |    General non-specific activism discussion    |    157,374 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 155,955 of 157,374    |
|    Topaz to All    |
|    The System    |
|    09 Jun 16 13:45:26    |
      From: mars1933@hotmail.com               Is it really in the best interest of the government to have its       elected representatives dependent upon money from the Israel Lobby and       the financial industry? Does it build trust, respect and cohesion to       have elected leaders bow and scrape before AIPAC and get kicked around       like lackeys by Goldman Sachs?               Has anyone within the American regnant elite ever read Machia-       velli? Remarkably, our elite feel that, because they are not elected       and thus not directly responsible for legislation and policy, they are       somehow invisible to the public, shielded from consequence by the       stooges who advance their agendas in exchange for campaign cash.               For our elites this is the end of history. Their power and position       is in their minds immutable and immune from all the hazards that have       laid waste the plans of mortals past.               The eclipse of the old WASP elite by the new Jewish-dominated elite       will not be a topic of general discussion, either among intellectuals       or the public at large.               Racially conscious Whites are a small minority within a large, com-       placent and disorganized group-a group that cannot look at data       and perceive the peril that they are in. Therefore only a process of       collapse-a collapse in which the institutions that the dominant elite       has spent generations infiltrating, building and controlling-could       make way for a takeover by a new elite dedicated to serving and       protecting that large, complacent and disorganized group from       dissolution and extinction.               Think for a moment about our trillion dollar wars in Iraq, Afghani-       stan and most Middle Eastern, Central Asian and African countries       where we have drone-based assassination programs. The populations       of these countries have no capability of threatening the United States       unless we carelessly allow the very people we have injured to immi-       grate and bring their hatreds with them, which, of course, we do.               In the midst of this lethal display of all or our latest whiz bang       robotic gadgetry, we are signaling desperation, and delusion. In       short, there is no plan, just a primitive urge to kill, and an       unverified guess that these tribal societies might be terrorized into       submission even though their submission cannot provide any       identifiable tangible benefits for the U.S.              We have absolutely no idea whether the fear and rage that these       strikes on civilians implant in the minds of an ever widening circle       of relations in these tribally based societies will induce compliance       and passivity or motivate them to action and retaliation. On the       surface, what all of this has to do with American interests is       unclear.               But then one must ask who actually sees these images of mecha-       nized death and terror. Do primitive tribesmen in Afghanistan actual-       ly see these televised images? Probably not. And if they are fed those       images by their own domestic or regional media, the purpose will       most probably be to provoke rage rather than fear.               However, as I remarked in an early post entitled "What it would       take to cleanse Serbia," it is very clear that these images of joy       stick death and destruction would certainly terrorize the population       of Connecticut. Perhaps the real purpose of these expenditures is not       only to collapse the governmental institutions of Israel's neighbors       so that they are incapable of posing a military threat to Israel, but       more importantly to give the population of Europe and North America a       profound respect for the technological power of the U. S. and       especially, its eagerness to use that power to kill any and all       potential threats and imagined enemies.               Thus, for the masses who are totally unfamiliar with the complex-       ion of our elite, these images of robotic airborne death give them       reason to cheer, being under the illusion that this power in some       indirect fashion belongs to "their country" and thus, indirectly to       them.               And more importantly, for those who are aware of the complexion       of our elite, and are repulsed by that elite and its agenda for world       domination, these images-while hideously expensive to generate-       are remarkably cheap to transmit and do indeed keep any potential       domestic dissidents feeling that resistance is futile.               Thus although the distant wars in Central Asia and Africa lack any       plausible military objective, and thus appear completely insane, nev-       ertheless, judging from the cheers provoked by several 2012 presiden-       tial primary contenders who promised to continue those wars, it       would appear that those wars have significant domestic propaganda       value as legitimizing displays of coercive power and brutality.               However, the propaganda value is being purchased on credit, and       two trillion dollars in debt must be paid back at some point, creating       massive potential for future deflation and falling living standards.               The point is that we of the White Nationalist persuasion must begin       to show our fellow Whites exactly how we will provide them with       tangible benefits. We need to show them that we are willing to go on       the political offensive against those institutions that are       essentially parasitic, and that add complexity and cost to the system       that does not produce benefits for the American middle class.               To the public we should minimize the chatter about race differ-       ences and talk about what we will do for them as individuals and as a       group.               If you want to save the White race you have to understand the       economy and show them how you would change it to redirect re-       sources to improve their lives.               If our fellow Whites do not want to hear about the health of the       race, that is fine. We can live with that. All we need to master is       the delivery of tangible benefits, unlike our competition which is       delivering "austerity" and falling living standards.               One recalls the famous words of Charlie Munger, the billionaire       partner of Warren Buffett, who famously "defended the U.S. financial-       company rescues of 2008 and told students that people in economic       distress should "suck it in and cope."               The victims of student loans will be the constituency most       amenable to our message. Unlike normal debt, this debt can never be       discharged in bankruptcy.               And while the unemployment rate of those with college degrees is       relatively low, there is a pattern whereby new graduates move back in       with parents and look for middle class jobs for a few months before       settling for $12 per hour jobs as grocery store clerks, waitresses,       and bank tellers.               Two thirds of today's new college graduates are going to have their       middle class aspirations frustrated and will be a receptive audience.       They are the quintessential victims of austerity.                                   www.tomatobubble.com www.ihr.org http://nationalvanguard.org              http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca