Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.activism    |    General non-specific activism discussion    |    157,361 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 156,008 of 157,361    |
|    Let My (BROWN FELON) People Free! to All    |
|    Supreme Court refuses to rehear traitor     |
|    16 Oct 16 07:22:47    |
      XPost: alt.politics.immigration, alt.impeach.obama, or.politics       XPost: alt.politics.democrat       From: racist-fool@barackobama.com              WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court refused Monday to reconsider       President Obama's proposed overhaul of the nation's immigration       system following a tie vote in June that blocked its       implementation.              The eight-member court's order shut the door on a plan that       already seemed all but dead a few months ago. The court declined       to wait until a ninth justice is confirmed and seated in order       to rehear the case — and possibly reverse its June decision.              The decision was applauded by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton,       who led a group of states in seeking to invalidate the plan.       "Rewriting national immigration law requires the full and       careful consideration of Congress," he said. "This is the latest       setback to the president’s attempt to expand executive power and       another victory for those who believe in the Constitution’s       separation of powers and the rule of law.”              The high court seldom agrees to rehear cases a second time, but       it has on occasion done so when a justice's death or retirement       leaves a vacancy that leads to a 4-4 tie. In those cases, the       court merely leaves the decision of the lower court intact and       sets no national precedent.              Acting U.S. Solicitor General Ian Gershengorn had told the       justices in July that Obama's effort to protect millions of       undocumented immigrants from deportation and allow them to seek       work permits deserved rehearing so that a divided federal       appeals court didn't get the last word on a national policy.              "The validity of the (immigration policy) is unlikely to arise       in any future case," his petition said. "This court instead       should be the final arbiter of these matters through a       definitive ruling."              http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/10/03/supreme-       court-immigration-rehearing-obama-scalia/91246566/                      --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca