XPost: hawaii.military, alt.military, soc.men   
   XPost: rec.arts.tv   
   From: no_offline_contact@example.com   
      
   On 2018-04-08 12:05 AM, Zombie Democrats wrote:   
   > She’s an evil, crooked, self-centered, corrupt heap of   
   > incompetence.   
   >   
   > Who are the haters? Who are the autocrats? Who are the serial   
   > abusers of power?   
   >   
   > Only one presidential candidate has wielded the sledgehammer of   
   > government against personal enemies. Only one presidential   
   > candidate has exploited a spouse’s public office to exact   
   > revenge on political dissenters.   
   >   
   > Only one presidential candidate has a quarter-century track   
   > record of taxpayer-subsidized demagoguery and class warfare.   
   >   
   > And, as the most recent undercover investigation by James   
   > O’Keefe’s Project Veritas revealed this past week, only one   
   > presidential candidate has been directly linked to a scheme to   
   > foment chaos and violence at her opponent’s rallies.   
   >   
   > Ignore the kindly grandma with the “Stronger Together” backdrop   
   > warbling about her happy family and singing the praises of   
   > diversity and inclusion. Look beyond the carefully manufactured   
   > semblance of bipartisanship and moderation.   
   >   
   > Remember history — or rather, “herstory.”   
   >   
   > Hillary Clinton isn’t just a nasty woman. She’s a ruthless   
   > hatemonger devoted wholly to two corrupt pursuits while on the   
   > federal teat: tearing down and cashing in.   
   >   
   > To clueless millennials, “bimbo eruptions” might sound like a   
   > Trumpism. But it was vintage Team Hillary’s misogynistic moniker   
   > for horndog Slick Willie’s accuser outbreaks in the 1990s.   
   >   
   > Respect for women? This is the snarling elitist who attacked   
   > Gennifer Flowers, a paramour of her cheating husband, as a   
   > “failed cabaret singer” whom she would verbally “crucify” if she   
   > had the chance.   
   >   
   > Just how vindictive can Crooked Grandma be? Ask the people who   
   > know her best. David Watkins, a former top administrative aide   
   > from Arkansas in the Clinton administration, laid out the then-   
   > first-lady’s central role in the crony-motivated White House   
   > travel-office firings.   
   >   
   > The Clintons’ old pal, Hollywood producer Harry Thomason, had   
   > pushed for wholesale dismissal of travel-office staff in favor   
   > of their connected friends.   
   >   
   > “We both know that there would be hell to pay,” Watkins informed   
   > chief of staff Thomas McLarty, if “we failed to take swift and   
   > decisive action in conformity with the First Lady’s wishes.”   
   >   
   > Indeed, Hill unleashed hell. Watkins was sacked under the guise   
   > of punishment for using a government helicopter as   
   > transportation to a golfing event — something that’s a privilege   
   > for presidents, not peons.   
   >   
   > He was far from alone. Bill and Hill’s IRS (two for the price of   
   > one, don’t forget) targeted conservative think tanks and   
   > nonprofits. Bill and Hill’s FBI improperly and illegally   
   > accessed the files of countless citizens who inconveniently   
   > ruined the Clinton narrative.   
   >   
   > And the woman who just weeks ago mauled millions of Trump   
   > supporters nationwide as “irredeemable” and “deplorable” is a   
   > pro at sweeping demonizations.   
   >   
   > Remember: She made a name for herself attacking life-saving drug   
   > companies as greedy profiteers in the 1990s, even as she and her   
   > husband raked in those companies’ campaign donations.   
   >   
   > Money-grubbers never change. While walloping drug companies   
   > again last year, she took more money from the nation’s 15   
   > largest pharmaceutical firms than all the GOP candidates   
   > combined.   
   >   
   > The two-faced, split-tongued politician who mocked Trump for   
   > calling out America’s rigged system came to power decrying the   
   > “vast right-wing conspiracy” to deflect from that blue dress her   
   > husband stained. She’s a menace to alternate media, to   
   > entrepreneurs, to honest, hard-working people, to the rule of   
   > law, public safety and national security.   
   >   
   > When you tune out the manufactured noise and distractions, when   
   > you ignore the media squirrels and engineered scuffles, when you   
   > rip up the gender card and contemplate nearly 25 years of the   
   > politics of personal destruction and private enrichment — not to   
   > mention the stand-alone disqualifying scandals of Benghazi,   
   > Emailgate, and the WikiLeaks disclosures — the choice should not   
   > be difficult.   
   >   
   > You can take a gamble on the imperfect businessman who has never   
   > held public office. Or you can go with the guaranteed   
   > continuation of Hillary Clinton’s entrenched climate of hate and   
   > culture of corruption. Left, right, or center, if you are   
   > opposed to Clintonian history repeating itself, you’ll take your   
   > chances with Trump. I am.   
   >   
   > http://www.nationalreview.com/article/441441/hillary-clinton-   
   > nasty-corrupt-evil-crooked-ruthless   
   >   
   >   
   What exactly was the point in re-publishing this article - which was   
   clearly intended to convince wavering voters to vote Trump rather than   
   Clinton in the 2016 presidential race - NOW, a year and a half AFTER the   
   election?   
      
   You do know the aphorism about shutting the barn door after the horse is   
   gone don't you? Or the one about crying over spilt milk?   
      
   --   
   Rhino   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)