XPost: alt.tv.pol-incorrect, alt.politics.congress, alt.politics.corruption   
   XPost: alt.censorship, alt.politics.economics, alt.politics.election   
   XPost: alt.politics.misc, alt.politics.obama, alt.politics.scorched-earth   
   XPost: alt.politics.socialism.mao, alt.politics.trump, alt.global-warming   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy, alt.apocolypse, alt.politics.usa   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.infowars, alt.beam-me-up.scott   
   .there-is-no.intelligent-life.down-here   
   XPost: alt.politics.guns   
   From: NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov   
      
   On 5/5/21 9:05 PM, Ubiquitous wrote:   
   > It has been two weeks since the conviction of ex-police officer Derek Chauvin   
   > for the second- and third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter of   
   > George Floyd. The world has moved on. Politicians breathed a sigh of relief   
   > when they heard the verdict; the media quickly moved on to its next   
   > manipulated data point in favor of the proposition that American police are   
   > systemically racist.   
   >   
   > But there were always lingering questions about the verdict. The biggest   
   > question was whether Chauvin could have received a fair trial. Jury selection   
   > happened while the city of Minneapolis publicized a $27 million settlement   
   > with Floyd’s family. The judge denied requests for a venue change despite   
   the   
   > fact that the trial would take place in a city that had been wracked with   
   > riots, looting and burning over Floyd’s death. One of the alternate jurors   
   > admitted, “I did not want to go through rioting and destruction again, and   
   I   
   > was concerned about people coming to my house if they were not happy with the   
   > verdict.”   
   >   
   > A sitting congresswoman traveled to town just before the verdict to suggest   
   > the possibility of violence were Chauvin to be acquitted; the president of   
   > the United States said openly the day before the verdict came down that he   
   > wanted a guilty verdict. Prominent politicians and leftist activists openly   
   > stated that without millions marching in the streets, Chauvin probably   
   > wouldn’t have even stood trial.   
   >   
   > Now, there was arguably evidence enough to convict Chauvin on the   
   > manslaughter charge. But the two murder charges were questionable, at the   
   > very least. There were serious questions to be asked about causation —   
   about   
   > whether Floyd died primarily as a result of Chauvin’s actions, or whether   
   his   
   > underlying drug use and 75% heart arterial blockage was the truer cause of   
   > his death. There were also serious questions about the level of force used   
   —   
   > when that level of force transformed from the clearly permissible to the   
   > feloniously criminal.   
   >   
   > And yet, after three weeks of testimony, the jury was out a mere 10 hours,   
   > asked zero questions of the judge and came back with a guilty verdict on all   
   > counts.   
   >   
   > advertisement   
   > Now it turns out that one of the jurors, Brandon Mitchell, 31, lied during   
   > the voir dire process for jury selection. In August 2020, Mitchell appeared   
   > in a photo wearing a black T-shirt with the words “Get Your Knee Off Our   
   > Necks” as well as a baseball cap with the letters “BLM” (for Black   
   Lives   
   > Matter). Mitchell had filled out a 14-page questionnaire in which he   
   > explicitly denied having participated in protests over police use of force.   
   > He told the judge that he could be an impartial juror.   
   >   
   > But this is of little consequence. Our establishment media will surely cover   
   > this story as a justifiable, if mildly uncomfortable, afterthought, if they   
   > cover it at all. Experts expect that even this evidence will not be enough to   
   > reverse the verdict in Chauvin’s case.   
   >   
   > Perhaps Chauvin deserved to be convicted. That’s an open question. He   
   > certainly deserved the same fair and impartial trial guaranteed every   
   > American citizen. It seems likely he didn’t receive such due process. But   
   few   
   > will care. Chauvin has been convicted, and due process is of little   
   > consequence when the safety of the nation relies on conviction. Social   
   > justice takes precedence over individual justice these days.   
   >   
   > --   
   > Trump won.   
   >   
      
      
    You can't have Social Justice and Equal Justice at the same time,   
   they're 'mutually exclusive'.	-BMUS-   
      
   I've been saying this for a few decades and now people are discovering   
   what it means..... The Marxist-Democrats Social Justice mantra is   
   anti-U.S. Constitution rhetoric from what appears to be the enemies of   
   the United States Constitution and the American dream.   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
   That's Karma   
      
   *The first rule of SURVIVAL CLUB is*   
   Never trust what Democrats or Marxists tell you. Make them prove it with   
   actual verifiable facts and science. And if you didn't find the lie in   
   what the Democrat-Marxists told you then you didn't dig deep enough. The   
   *Gruber Doctrine* is the Marxist plan that says it's "to the Democrats   
   advantage to have a lack of transparency and then lie about everything".   
   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G790p0LcgbI   
      
      
      
   *The next rule of SURVIVAL CLUB is*   
   There be a protest when a Black shoots a Black, just like there is when   
   a Cop shoots a black, since all Black lives Matter.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)