home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.activism      General non-specific activism discussion      157,361 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 157,015 of 157,361   
   Jos Boersema to Intelligent Party   
   Re: What Makes A Country, Your Country?   
   12 Sep 23 17:01:22   
   
   XPost: talk.politics.theory, soc.rights.human   
   From: Josjoha@market.socialism.nl   
      
   ["Followup-To:" header set to alt.activism.]   
   On 2023-09-03, Intelligent Party  wrote:   
   > 1. The Right to Work.   
      
   An equal and inalienable right to free land (natural resources).   
      
   > 2. The Right to Reside.   
      
   ... if born or naturalized according to law.   
      
   > 3. Equal Rights.   
      
   Yes, including to natural resources for free.   
      
   > 4. Political Rights.   
      
   Inalienable political rights from an age defined by law. I would propose   
   25 years, or older.   
      
   > 5. Human Rights.  And how is anybody so dumb, to think they have wrongs,   
   without a   
   > right violated?   
      
   ... and many more rights and obligations as well.   
      
   > Yet any little right violated, is not cause for homicide.   
   >   
   > Prohibition is as wrong, as Hitler's 3rd Reich.   
      
   Prohibition of alcohol or drugs has proven to be a disaster, because the   
   lust for these substances is irrepressable on the one hand, and giving   
   the profits to organized crime is a recipe for Government corruption and worse.   
      
   > We the People, demand the governments of the world, cease and desist from all   
   > prohibitions of all types, whether or not, they are Dictatorships,   
   Republics, or   
   > have a 51% or greater vote.   
      
   The idea of "Governments of the world" is accepting the world is being   
   ruled by one clique, one Government, or at least to position yourself as   
   a global political base.   
      
   I would like to ask *my* Government, to stop following absurd United   
   States of America prohibition laws, which seem to be designed to enrich   
   organized crime, and to take away any form of reliable Government run   
   for and by ordinary people. Perhaps a policy where the Government   
   tightly controls the drugs market can manage to push organized crime   
   out of the local drugs market. The state could be involved in drugs   
   production and sales, while engaging in a strong anti-drugs information   
   campaign to reduce dangerous drugs use. If only one person use amounts   
   can be sold to people who also provably consumed that purchase, only   
   allowed for people of the Dutch nationality, this could reduce unwanted   
   drugs tourism to our country. If free market and sales remain repressed   
   as in other countries, other countries should have no reason to be upset   
   by sensible Dutch drugs laws.   
      
   Needless to say, we need to stop being part of incorrigibly corrupt   
   entities, such as the E.U. and more broadly the USA global Empire (E.U.,   
   United Nations, NATO, etc). One reason: Prohibition and associated rise   
   of crime & corruption.   
      
   We need to stay part of many trade agreements however, unless we want to   
   accept a severe economic downturn (I guess), which could undermine the   
   whole thing.   
      
   However, realism dictates that the future will be the opposite: further   
   global integration under ultimately the allincae and confluence: organized   
   crime, wicked super rich power lusting insane people, and ... the dumb   
   who believe in it, leading to World War 3 and another attempt to worsen   
   their stranglehold over mankind in general.   
      
   Will they launch the nukes ? Of course they will. Destroying entire   
   cities is expected behavior among humans. Nukes merely streamline and   
   speed up this proces.   
      
   THEY DON'T CARE. (An old Fascist slogan.)   
      
   They have bunkers too, and in the ultimate top they are probably working   
   together. Even if not, criminals are natural risk takers. If humanity in   
   general wakes up to a crashed economy, a Revolution could be more   
   dangerous to the global power brokers than a global nuclear war, a war   
   which they control either entirely or partially.   
      
   A lot of money has been spend on nukes. The present generations do not   
   fear war as much as the previous generations who have lived through it.   
   People don't listen to the horror stories of the people who have   
   survived modern war. Threatening with war is not as effective as it was   
   during the Cold War. There was always the next maximum effort war.   
   Corruption and decay is rising. Science and scholarship of universities   
   is generally a failure, since they did not bring peace to humanity in   
   equal measure as they brought more dangerous weapons. Corona virus   
   policies show: mankind accepts anything, there is no political fight   
   left in these people. At least not for the moment. War erases all old   
   scams by the powerful, creates a new trauma to base another Empire upon.   
   A crises to be used to further centralize control. A man facing famine   
   might more readily accept a chip in the head, than one who is having a   
   month long vacation to the sun every year.   
      
   etc.   
   --   
   Economic & political ideology, worked out into Constitutional models,   
   with a multi-facetted implementation plan. http://market.socialism.nl   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca