Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.activism    |    General non-specific activism discussion    |    157,374 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 157,129 of 157,374    |
|    Perverts Anonymous to All    |
|    Silicon Valley, the New Lobbying Monster    |
|    11 Oct 24 22:14:16    |
      [continued from previous message]              shadowy conservative cabal were so effective that the Times later       declared Lehane to be the modern-day “master of the political dark       arts.”              After serving in the White House, Lehane joined Al Gore’s Presidential       campaign, as press secretary, and after Gore’s defeat he set up shop in       San Francisco. Despite the size and the electoral significance of       California, many campaign operatives viewed the state as a political       backwater, because it was so far away from Washington. But Lehane, who       had worked on the Telecommunications Act of 1996, was convinced that       Silicon Valley was the future, and he quickly built a business       providing his dark arts to wealthy Californians. When trial lawyers       wanted to increase the state’s caps on medical-malpractice jury awards,       they brought in Lehane, who helped send voters flyers that looked like       cadaver toe tags, and produced ads implying that doctors might be       performing surgery while drunk. A few years later, when a prominent       environmentalist hired Lehane to campaign against the Keystone XL       Pipeline, he sent activists into press conferences carrying vials of       sludge from an oil spill; the sludge was so noxious that reporters fled       the room. Then he hired one of the Navy SEALs who had helped kill Osama       bin Laden to talk to journalists and explain that if the pipeline were       approved a terrorist attack could flood Nebraska with one of the       largest oil spills in American history. Lehane explained to a reporter       his theory of civil discourse: “Everyone has a game plan until you       punch them in the mouth. So let’s punch them in the mouth.”              Video From The New Yorker                                   But Lehane’s efforts generally failed to impress the tech industry. For       decades, Silicon Valley firms had considered themselves mostly detached       from electoral politics. As one senior tech executive explained to me,       until about the mid-twenty-tens, “if you were a V.C. or C.E.O. you       might hire lobbyists to talk to politicians, or gossip with you, but,       beyond that, most of the Valley thought politics was stupid.” Within a       decade of Lehane’s move West, however, a new kind of tech company was       emerging: so-called sharing-economy firms such as Uber, Airbnb, and       TaskRabbit. These companies were “disrupting” long-established sectors,       including transportation, hospitality, and contract labor. Politicians       had long considered it their prerogative to regulate these sectors,       and, as some of the startups’ valuations grew into the billions,       politicians began making demands on them as well. They felt affronted       by companies like Uber that were refusing to abide by even modest       regulations. Other companies tried a more conciliatory approach, but       quickly found themselves mired in local political infighting and       municipal bureaucracies. In any case, “not understanding politics       became an existential risk,” another senior tech executive said. “There       was a general realization that we had to get involved in politics,       whether we wanted to or not.”              In 2015, San Francisco itself became the site of a major regulation       battle, in the form of Proposition F, a ballot initiative to limit       short-term housing rentals, which both sides acknowledged was an attack       on Airbnb. The proposal had emerged from built-up frustrations: some       San Franciscans complained that many buildings had essentially become       unlicensed hotels, hosting hard-partying tourists who never turned off       the music, didn’t clean up their trash, and—most worrying for city       leaders—hadn’t paid the taxes that the city would have collected had       they stayed at a Marriott. Other residents argued that Airbnb’s       presence was making it harder to find affordable housing, because it       was more profitable to rent to short-term visitors than to long-term       tenants. Proposition F would essentially make it impossible for Airbnb       to work with many homeowners for more than a few weeks a year. Early       polling indicated that the initiative was popular. Numerous other       cities had been considering similar legislation, and were eagerly       watching to see if lawmakers in San Francisco—where Airbnb was       headquartered—could teach them how to rein in the Internet giant, then       worth some twenty-five billion dollars.              Airbnb’s executives, panicked, called Lehane and asked him to come to       their headquarters; he showed up within minutes of their call, in the       sweatpants and baseball jersey that he’d been wearing at his son’s       Little League game. Lehane has the lean build of someone accustomed to       athletic self-torture—he runs daily, often fifteen miles at a stretch,       typically while sending oddly punctuated e-mails and leaving stream-of-       consciousness voice mails—and he has a boyish crooked front tooth that       offsets the effect of his receding hairline. To Airbnb’s leaders, he       didn’t look like much of a political guru. But, once Lehane caught his       breath, he launched into a commanding speech. You’re looking at this       situation all wrong, he said. Proposition F wasn’t a crisis—it was an       opportunity to change San Francisco’s political landscape, to upend a       narrative. The key, he told executives, was to build a campaign against       Proposition F as sophisticated as Barack Obama’s recent Presidential       run, and to deploy insane amounts of money as a warning to politicians       that an “Airbnb voter” existed—and ought not be crossed. He proposed a       three-pronged strategy, and explained to executives that what       politicians care about most is reëlection. If the company could show       that being anti-Airbnb would make it harder for them to stay in office,       they would fall in line. Lehane was soon named Airbnb’s head of global       policy and public affairs.              His first step in this role was to mobilize Airbnb’s natural advocates:       the homeowners who were profiting by renting out their properties, and       the visitors who had avoided pricey hotel rooms by using the service.       By the end of 2015, more than a hundred and thirty thousand people had       rented or hosted rooms in San Francisco. Lehane recruited several       former Obama-campaign staffers to lead teams who made tens of thousands       of phone calls to Airbnb hosts and renters, warning them about       Proposition F. The team members also urged hosts to attend town-hall       meetings, talk to neighbors, and call local officials. During this       period, the company—accidentally, it says—sent an e-mail to everyone       who had ever stayed in a California Airbnb, urging them to contact the       California legislature. The legislature was inundated with messages       from around the world. The Senate president pro tem called Lehane to       let him know that the message had been received, and to beg him to stop       the onslaught. “I kind of wish we had done it on purpose,” someone       close to that campaign told me.              The second part of Lehane’s strategy was to use large amounts of money       to pressure San Francisco politicians. The company brought on hundreds       of canvassers to knock on the doors of two hundred and eighty-five       thousand people—roughly a third of the city’s population—and urge them       to contact their local elected officials and say that opposing Airbnb       was the equivalent of attacking innovation, economic independence, and       America’s ideals. The relentless campaign posed a clear threat to the       city’s Board of Supervisors: if an official supported Proposition F,       Airbnb might encourage someone to run against him or her. “We said the       quiet part out loud,” a campaign staffer said. “The goal was       intimidation, to let everyone know that if they fuck with us they’ll              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca