Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.activism    |    General non-specific activism discussion    |    157,361 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 157,130 of 157,361    |
|    Perverts Anonymous to All    |
|    Silicon Valley, the New Lobbying Monster    |
|    11 Oct 24 22:14:16    |
      [continued from previous message]              regret it.” In all, Airbnb spent eight million dollars on the campaign,       roughly ten times as much as all of Proposition F’s supporters       combined. “It was the most ridiculous campaign I’ve ever worked on,”       the staffer told me. “It was so over the top, so extreme. You shouldn’t       be able to spend that much on a municipal election.” That said, the       staffer loved her time at Airbnb: “It was the most money I’d ever       earned working in politics.”              The third aspect of Lehane’s strategy was upending the debate over       Proposition F by proposing alternative solutions. Otherwise, Lehane and       Airbnb’s chief executive, Brian Chesky, believed, the company would       face similar proposals in other cities. “You can’t just be against       everything,” Lehane told the Airbnb board. “You have to be for       something.” As a compromise gesture, Airbnb had voluntarily begun       paying taxes on short-term stays within the city. It also offered to       share some internal company data—such as the number of guests visiting       the city each month—that would help local officials monitor the       service’s impact on the community. What’s more, Airbnb eventually       offered to build a Web interface that San Francisco officials could use       to register hosts and track rental patterns. The solution was self-       serving, in that it made the city dependent on Airbnb for monitoring       Airbnb’s activities. But the proposals addressed many of the complaints       that had prompted Proposition F. More important, they guaranteed San       Francisco tens of millions of tax dollars annually. When Proposition F       finally came to a vote, it was resoundingly defeated.              Airbnb’s approach to political conflict was in stark contrast with that       of Uber, which had just become the most valuable startup in the       world—and which, owing to its resistance to various taxi regulations,       was soon under fire from multiple cities and nations. Airbnb’s tactics       were designed to appeal to politicians’ higher ideals. After the       Proposition F campaign, Lehane began working on a partnership with the       S.E.I.U., one of the nation’s largest labor unions, to unionize the       workers who cleaned Airbnb rentals. The plan never came together, but       labor-friendly politicians in San Francisco and New York began viewing       Airbnb as a potential ally.              To other political operatives, Lehane’s tactics hardly seemed       groundbreaking. But within Silicon Valley his approach was a       revelation. “It was a huge bang for a relatively small outlay,” a tech       executive told me. “It turns out the R.O.I.”—return on investment—“on       politics is way better than anyone suspected.”              After the defeat of Proposition F, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors       eventually agreed to many of Airbnb’s suggestions. By then, Lehane had       moved on to other locations. He began similar Airbnb campaigns in       dozens of other cities, including Barcelona, Berlin, New York, and       Mexico City. When the U.S. Conference of Mayors convened in Washington,       D.C., in 2016, Lehane was invited to speak after Michelle Obama. “Read       my lips,” he told the gathering. “We want to pay taxes.” Airbnb soon       had agreements with more than a hundred cities, and when local       politicians proved intransigent—leaders in Austin, for instance, seemed       immune to Airbnb’s overtures—the company simply went over their heads.       In Texas, it persuaded the state legislature to make it hard for any       municipality to ban short-term rentals. Today, Airbnb has agreements       with thousands of cities.              A few years after Lehane joined Airbnb, a venture capitalist pulled him       aside at a party and said, “It used to be, hiring the right C.F.O. was       the most important thing to make sure a company goes public. But you’ve       proved a political person is just as important.” Lehane, however, had       had an even bigger insight. These campaigns had revealed that tech       companies—particularly firms, like Airbnb, with platforms that connect       people who might otherwise have trouble finding one another—were now       potentially the most powerful cohort in politics. “At one point,       organizations like labor or political parties had the ability to       organize and really turn out large numbers of voters,” Lehane told me.       Today, Internet platforms have the bigger reach; a tech company can       communicate with hundreds of millions of people by pushing a button.       “If Airbnb can engage fifteen thousand hosts in a city, that can have       an impact on who wins a city-council race or the mayoralty,” Lehane       told me. “In a congressional or Senate race, fifty thousand votes can       make all the difference.” Of course, simply having a huge user base       doesn’t guarantee that Airbnb can get everything it wants. Voters       respond only to enticements that they find persuasive. But companies       like Airbnb, Lehane understood, could make arguments faster, and more       efficiently, than nearly any political party or other special-interest       group, and this was a source of considerable power. “The platforms are       really the only ones who can speak to everyone now,” Lehane said.              For the tech industry, the Trump years were a bewildering mess. The       President attacked tech platforms for being biased against       conservatives, and liberals railed against Silicon Valley’s social-       media companies for propelling Trump into the White House. Tech       executives declared their support for the industry’s many immigrants in       the face of Trump’s Muslim ban and border separations; they also       contended with walkouts and protests from employees over racial       injustice, sexual harassment, and all-gender bathrooms—subjects that       neither an engineering degree nor business school had prepared them       for. When Joe Biden won the Presidency, in 2020, the Valley’s leaders       were relieved. The Biden Administration seemed like a return to the Pax       Obama, an era when tech was considered cool and politicians boasted of       knowing Mark Zuckerberg. Biden’s victory also meant that Lehane, with       his deep roots in the Democratic Party, was unquestionably Silicon       Valley’s top political guru. Companies sought him out; employees loved       that he was generous with credit and made politics fun. (Many former       colleagues talk proudly about the nicknames that he bestowed upon       them.) Most of all, he made the people he worked with feel like they       were on a righteous quest. Peter Ragone, a prominent adviser to       numerous Democratic politicians, told me that, among the handful of       political consultants transforming Silicon Valley, “Chris is the tip of       the spear. His capacity for processing information at speed is       breathtaking.”              The Valley’s enthusiasm for Biden, however, was short-lived. The       President quickly appointed three prominent tech skeptics—Gary Gensler,       Lina Khan, and Jonathan Kanter—to oversee the Securities and Exchange       Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, and the antitrust division of       the Department of Justice, respectively. Soon the government was suing       or investigating Google, Apple, Amazon, Meta, Tesla, and dozens of       other companies. Some of those suits and inquiries had been initiated       under Trump, but Biden’s S.E.C. found a particular target in the       cryptocurrency industry. Gensler, an ally of Elizabeth Warren, filed       more than eighty legal actions arguing that crypto firms or promoters       had violated the law, most often by selling unregistered securities.       Some of the executives being sued by the S.E.C. had contributed       lavishly to the Democrats. Brad Garlinghouse, the C.E.O. of the crypto       firm Ripple, who had been a fund-raising bundler for Obama, was among              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca