From: j.rennie1@ntlworld.com   
      
   "Earl Evleth"  wrote in message   
   news:BB277257.9A0B%evleth@wanadoo.fr...   
   > On 1/07/03 16:38, in article 20030701103817.04369.00002142@mb-m15.aol.com,   
   > "JIGSAW1695"  wrote:   
   >   
   > >>> He was appointed by the Supreme Court, NOT democratically elected.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Earl   
   > >> ==========================================================   
   > >   
   > > Hmmmm....some thought on that one Earl. Since President Bush was not   
   elected   
   > > president as you claim, does that mean that this current term does not   
   count?   
   >   
   > Read what I wrote, he was not "democratically" elected.  That means he did   
   > not receive a majority of the popular vote.   
   >   
   > I was wonder whether you would catch that nuance, figure it out.  Sure   
   > enough you missed it.   
   >   
   > Earl   
   >   
   >   
      
   But then as PV is never tired of telling us the USA is a Republic   
   not a democracy. Earl.    Would you say that Churchill was   
   democratically elected to power in the UK in 1951?   
   He received nearly half a million votes less than Atlee did.   
   Indeed Churchill was never chosen by the majority of the   
   British.      Another useless statistic coming up.   If   
   women had never been allowed to vote in the UK, the   
   Labour Party would have won every election since   
   1945.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)