home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.activism.death-penalty      Nice place to discuss frying criminals      95,350 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 94,867 of 95,350   
   Webbster to All   
   Re: As usual, Baxter is Lying (WAS: Re:    
   29 Oct 25 03:29:49   
   
   ing.cocksucking.dwarf.com> 8b9cfdc2   
   XPost: alt.atheism, or.politics, sac.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com   
      
   Klaus  Schadenfreude  wrote   
   in   
   news:pc82gk565smp6vuideq21lcbnftdkr859p@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuck   
   ing.dwarf.com:   
      
   > [Default]  Webbster  typed:   
   >   
   >>Doctors and medical scientists have been using that terminolgy since   
   the   
   >>1970's.  The debate is long over, and you're just an ignorant retard   
   >>yelling at the clouds.   
   >   
   > AI says:   
   >   
   > how long have doctors been using the term "assigned" when a baby is   
   > born and they are recording the sex?   
   >   
   > Good question — that term (“assigned male/female at birth”) is   
   > actually pretty modern.   
   >   
   > Historically, doctors didn’t say they were “assigning” a sex. For most   
   > of medical history, they simply *recorded* the observed anatomy as   
   > “male” or “female” — no philosophical framing about it.   
   >   
   > Here’s a timeline in broad strokes:   
   >   
   > Before 1960s: Medical records just said “sex: male/female.” No talk of   
   > “assignment.”   
   >   
   > 1960s–1970s: The idea of “sex assignment” emerged in medical   
   > literature about intersex infants, especially after psychologist John   
   > Money and others began using terms like sex of rearing and sex   
   > assignment in cases where surgery or social decisions were made about   
   > ambiguous genitalia.   
   >   
   > 1980s–1990s: “Assigned sex” began to appear in academic writing in   
   > gender studies and feminist theory, emphasizing that sex designation   
   > at birth is a social and medical decision, not just a biological   
   > observation.   
   >   
   > 2000s–2010s: “Assigned male/female at birth” became common in both   
   > medical *discussions* about intersex and in LGBTQ+ and transgender   
   > contexts, as a neutral way to distinguish biological classification   
   > from gender identity.   
   >   
   > Today: The term “assigned” is widely used in social sciences,   
   > gender-affirming care, and inclusive medicine, though traditional   
   > birth certificates and medical records still usually just say “sex:   
   > male/female.”   
   >   
      
   LOL, KKKlaun proves what I said, but claims that I lied.   
      
      
   --   
     @..@   
    (----)   
   ----------   
   United we ribbit, divided we croak   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca