XPost: alt.atheism, or.politics, sac.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: jfwalby@gmaill.com
Attila wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 10:27:29 -0600, The World of Is!
> in alt.atheism with message-id
> wrote:
>
>> Attila wrote:
>>> On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 06:58:38 -0600, The World of Is!
>>> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 5 Nov 2025 18:17:06 -0600, The World of Is!
>>>>> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Attila wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 4 Nov 2025 04:47:35 -0000 (UTC), Webbster
>>>>>>> in alt.atheism with message-id
>>>>>>> <10ec0h7$3dg3f$1@dont-email.me> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Trump wants to build nuclear power plants.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He has chosen Westinghouse to build them.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He will pay Westinghouse $80 billion for the projects.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In return he has compelled Westinghouse to pay him the
government 20
>>>>>>>> percent of any “cash distributions.”
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Between now and the end of January 2029, the government can
compel
>>>>>>>> Westinghouse to go public via an IPO, at which point the government
will be
>>>>>>>> awarded 20 percent ownership of the company, likely making it the
single
>>>>>>>> largest shareholder.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is literally seizing the means of production - AKA Socialism
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Socialism takes 100% of everything in sight.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Socialism in action will be shown under the mew mayor of NY.
>>>>>>> As long as the city survives the experience.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're an alarmist. Socialism is not communism and increasing the
>>>>>> socialist nature is like a pH measure not an inducement to 100%
>>>>>> socialism. Libraries are socialist structures how are they bad?
>>>>>
>>>>> Libraries do not produce a product for sale.
>>>>>
>>>>> Where is the money coming from to support all of the free
>>>>> stuff socialism promises? Will you work for nothing to help
>>>>> produce any of it?
>>>>>
>>>>> Before you say "Tax the rich" be aware the "rich" are the
>>>>> one's who can easiest afford to simply pick up and move out
>>>>> of the tax jurisdiction. Frequently taking their business
>>>>> with them.
>>>>>
>>>> I guess that's the point. 100% socialism means 100% tax on everybody and
>>>> everybody consumes free resources. There is not 100% tax which means
>>>> there is a long ways to go to pure socialism and you are getting up in
>>>> the air about services that should be available to everyone becoming
>>>> available.
>>>
>>> What you describe is Communism. "From each according to his
>>> ability, to each according to his need" Which sounds good
>>> if you are talking about a computer run economy. Mix in
>>> people and the Orwell effect quickly emerges. "Some pigs
>>> are more equal than others."
>>>
>>> See the USSR for a textbook example.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why do you claim healthcare should not be available to everyone? Do you
>>>> consider some people to be dogs and beneath the system?
>>>
>>> Why should the government be involved in the healthcare
>>> system at all beyond insuring it is not full of quacks and
>>> the pure food and drug laws are followed?
>>>
>> Because wealth is not a reliable indication of a person's merit.
>
> Why should the government be involved with a person's merit?
> And what does that have to do with the subject?
>
You gonna play stupid like a rock?
That's enough from you for awhile.
--
The esssential conditions of everything you do must be choice, love, and
passion.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
