Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.activism.death-penalty    |    Nice place to discuss frying criminals    |    95,350 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 95,107 of 95,350    |
|    Attila to mnp3d9F9qphU1@mid.individual.net    |
|    Re: tRump socialist (2/2)    |
|    14 Nov 25 15:07:21    |
      [continued from previous message]              >>>>>>> A lot of the Trades will go away too.       >>>>>>       >>>>>> And a lot will not.       >>>>>>       >>>>>       >>>>> And there will be more applicants than openings. In EVERY senario you       >>>>> find massive numbers of unemployed and unemployables. What are you going       >>>>> to do - let them starve? They will turn to crime before that.       >>>>       >>>> There are always jobs available for those who will take the       >>>> training. At the moment there 10,000 ATC openings for       >>>> example.       >>>>       >>>> The government cannot be everything to everyone. The idea       >>>> that "the rich" can be made to pay for everything is       >>>> economic nonsense.       >>>>       >>>> I am still waiting for a definition of "fair share".       >>>>       >>> What about a flat income tax? Maybe 20% for everyone? Then "the rich"       >>> would pay their "fair share."       >>       >> That doesn't take into account the core expense of staying       >> alive. Things like food, shelter, clothing, energy, and in       >> today's world transportation.       >>       >> X% of one person could be the difference between living and       >> dying while that same X% of another would not impact their       >> lifestyle much less their life. A flat tax sounds good but       >> it would be complex to implement.       >>       >It's possible to talk about though isn't it?              You can talk about antigravity.              > I think that constitutes a       >fair share, mainly because it is incredibly more than the billionaires       >are paying presently.              Perhaps they pay a proper amount based upon their       contribution to society.              >       >You asked for a definition - that is one for me.              That isn't a definition. It is a suggested method for tax       collection. One that will not work without a lot of       exemptions, which would not make it very fair.                     > It is also a worker       >ideal that billionaires would pay 20% income tax because a lot of weight       >off of our shoulders.              Why should someone else work to earn money just to reduce       the weight on your shoulders? If I was offered a job where       I would work twice as hard for almost no increase in income       I would simply stay where I am. Why should my goal be to       provide what a worker would consider ideal? I much prefer       what I would consider ideal.                     Why should I start a company, work 18 hours a day seven days       a week for years before making it highly successful only to       have most of the profits eaten up by taxes?              --                     Every person in the US is here either       legally or illegally. Those that are       here illegally should be afraid.       Be very afraid. It does not matter       how long you have been here. It does       not matter why you are here. It does not       matter what you have done legally while you       were here. It does not matter what any       relative may have done while you were here.       It only matters that you are here illegally.       It may take a day, a week, a year, or longer       but we will find you and we will deport you.       Be prepared.              Deport them all.              All politicians are trained to lie       and make those lies sound like       the truth. They start with the biggest       lie of all: Politicians are public       servants.              The Dims have an appropriate party       symbol: A jackass.              National Socialist American Workers Party       (NSAWP) formally known as the Democrat Party              Some of the Republican positions I find disgusting       and abhorrent.       Most of the Democratic positions I find terrifying.              I support:              A Constitional Amendment establishing       the Freedom of Choice.              The elimination of public expression,       display or support of religion or       religious positions.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca