XPost: alt.religion.jehovahs-wit, soc.culture.scottish, uk.religion.misc
From: ccaine@worldnet.att.net
"Duke of URL" wrote in message
news:10faeq94n0h5kd0@corp.supernews.com...
> Robert Peffers wrote:
> > "1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist" wrote
> > in message news:CAMIc.23$w_6.18@newsfe1-win.ntli.net...
> >>
> >> "Jabriol" wrote in message
> >> news:20040712161944.CE2EBB713@xprdmailfe15.nwk.excite.com...
> >>
> >> Sure was quick work, but I noticed not one of your women had a veil
> >> or headcovering when they attended the church assembly. This is
> >> against what is taught in Scripture, for if women will not veil
> >> themselves they must shave their head.....
> >
> > How you know they did not have shaven heads under wigs?
> >>
> >> " 4 Any man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors
> >> his head, 5 but any woman who prays or prophesies with her head
> >> unveiled dishonors her head -- it is the same as if her head were
> >> shaven. 6 For if a woman will not veil herself, then she should cut
> >> off her hair; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to be shorn or
> >> shaven, let her wear a veil. 7 For a man ought not to cover his
> >> head, since he is the image and glory of God; but woman is the glory
> >> of man. 8 (For man was not made from woman, but woman from man. 9
> >> Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man.) 10 That is
> >> why a woman ought to have a veil on her head, because of the
> >> angels." 1 Cor 11:3-10 (RSV)
> >
> > Yeah! But they did not have wigs when that was written.
>
> Not true - they had wigs clear back into the early days of the Babylonian
&
> Egyptian empires.
As well you know, having lived in both empires.
;=)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
