Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.activism.community    |    alt.activism.community    |    1,639 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 1,064 of 1,639    |
|    Erich Friesen to All    |
|    Re: Raymond Burke's Curious doctrine    |
|    07 Aug 04 22:58:07    |
      XPost: alt.activism, alt.recovery.catholicism, talk.religion.chr       stian.roman-catholic       XPost: tnn.religion.catholic       From: erichbfnoospaaaam@networkusa.net              The new doctrine implied by Archbishop Raymond Burke's recent public       statements is indeed curious, though it is regrettably not unprecedented.       Under this doctrine there seem to be two categories of the unborn, and they       deserve completely different accounting in the moral sphere.              One class of the unborn deserves very little recognition, and can apparently       be killed wholesale without much concern. Into this first class fall, for       example, the unborn victims of war, the countless unborn who will die       directly as a result of policies originating from the current       administration's suppression of the evidence of global warming, those       unborn poor who need quality healthcare, among other groups too numerous to       mention here. Lest we forget, there are many of the born in similar groups       who are dieing each day.              The other class of unborn is so especially deserving of our protection,       however, that even though the President has no direct legal authority to       protect them, the mere announcement of his opposition to a legal precedent       enjoins us to put all other concerns out of mind, and cast our vote, as       unthinking automatons, to continue the slaughter of those unborn in the       first class.              Therefore I, being uneducated by only 2 degrees from Jesuit Universities,       must ask Raymond Burke to clarify, with some precision, what are those       characteristics of the first class of the unborn that make them so       undeserving of protection and conversely makes those in the second class so       especially deserving of our protection? This question deeply vexes me.              Regards,                     Erich Friesen              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca