Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.activism.community    |    alt.activism.community    |    1,639 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 140 of 1,639    |
|    sarahtnin to All    |
|    Noam Chomsky Interview (1/2)    |
|    05 Feb 04 10:11:04    |
      From: sarahtnin@yahoo.com              copyright 2001 Numb Magazine              The Naked Emperor:              Jewel Welter Interviews the Very Clothed Noam Chomsky                                          Massachusetts Institute of Technology linguistics professor Noam Chomsky is       well acquainted with the controversy's seeds. A quick perusal of Internet       keywords associated with his name reveals designations like dissident,       socialist, radical, modern Copernicus, anarchist, scholar, and critical       thinker. Indeed, a brief conversation shows Chomsky as these terms and       more. Critics occasionally mistake Chomsky's stoicism for aggression. In       actuality, his outward pugnacity shrouds his unfeigned candor in discussing       global affairs.              During the fall of 2001, Chomsky toured India. His trip coincided with       September 11, 2001, the day a group of men hijacked two jet planes and       crashed into the World Trade Center. The eleventh shocked American citizens       whose grasp of world events depended upon information the media relayed       through television. For political analysts like Noam Chomsky, the eleventh       was a spoke in a wheel of long-spinning persecution. Since its origins, the       United States forcefully obliterated opponents to its aim of world       superiority. What writer Rudyard Kipling characterized as the "White Man's       Burden" symbolized the United States' pattern of oppressing newly conquered       territories. European despots displayed values to the original colonists       that later filtered into American policy.              United States government is technically an oligarchy. An oligarchy's       political structure authorizes a small party of individuals to govern the       daily lives of the larger citizenry. If the United States operated as a       democracy, congressional sessions would last years since government       assemblies require each person's presence. Efficiency demands the       concentration of power into an easily manageable body of persons; however,       efficiency cannot explain the atrocities the US administration has committed       and then, distorted to deceive the populace.              President George W. Bush's Junior's "War on Terrorism" resembles President       John F. Kennedy's vow to "end Communism" by siding with South Vietnam       against North Vietnam. North Vietnam's population consisted of impoverished       herders and farmers, similar to Afghanistan's population. Culturally, South       and North Vietnam were bound to clash because of South Vietnam's vastly       different and prosperous merchant economy and politicians like Bao Dai and       Ngo Dinh Diem. South Vietnamese Ho Chi Minh became American Enemy Number       One, instead of a dynamic man fighting to free his homeland from outside       interference. Years before the Vietnam War, France's colonialist regime       controlled Vietnam. Minh believed Vietnam needed a chance to heal, rather       than ruled by another tyrannical power with European roots (like the US).              Suspected mastermind Osama bin Laden has supplanted Minh as American Enemy       Number One. "Bin Laden," says Chomsky, "proclaims that violence is       justified in self-defense against the infidels who invade and occupy Muslim       lands like Bosnia, Egypt and Saudi Arabia--and against the brutal and       corrupt governments they impose there. Not so differently, Bush maintains       that violence is justified to drive terrorism and evil from American lands.       To Bush, American lands are the world and not just territories marked as       American by ownership. That Bush can speak so casually of violence should       be alarming to Americans as should the sacrifice of civilians on both       sides."              The largest part of the people killed on the eleventh were common       workers--people with vocations like secretary, firefighter, police officer,       maintenance worker, and rescue volunteer. If the crash's perpetrators       wanted to punish the American government, killing overwhelming numbers of       the working classes, rather than government personnel, was not effective.       Sadly and ironically, the people slain after Bush Junior's Afghanistan       bombings were civilians.              During the interview, Chomsky says that the eleventh's large-scale loss was       unmistakably appalling. Additionally, the bombings correlated to the US       overseas policies, like President William Clinton's decision to bomb Sudan       and the more than 500,000 Iraqi people killed since 1998. Of Sudan's       bombing, Chomsky observes, "The atrocity destroyed half the pharmaceutical       supplies of a poor African country and those agencies assisting Sudan's       population with a grievous human toll. The United States blocked specific       figures for the death toll when the UN inquired of figures. Few were       interested enough to further pursue the matter, so the number remains       undocumented." The factory in Sudan supplied medicines to keep such       illnesses as tuberculosis and malaria from infecting the Sudanese       population. Since the bombing, the death toll has increased because of the       lack of medical treatment--with numbers more shocking than the eleventh's       reported figures.              Nevertheless, the eleventh was a roar from a monster created by Presidents       George H. W. Bush Senior and Ronald Reagan. Reagan signed National Security       Decision Directive 166, which covertly supplied more than 65,000 tons of       munitions and CIA personnel to the Pakistani Mujahideen. Directive 166       sought to combat the threat of Communism. The Bush Administration, in 1989,       also offered $1 billion in aid to Iraq's Ministry of Industry and Military       Production. Reagan and Bush Senior helped build bin Laden's al Quaida       Network, the Taliban, and Saddam Hussein.              Bush Junior's "War on Terrorism" is as faulty as Kennedy's war to "stop       Communism." Terrorism and Communism are ideas, and therefore, cannot be       stopped. Stopping terrorism requires the systematic decimation of material       referencing terrorism and the people practicing or conceptually       understanding terrorism. Had outsiders not attacked the United States on       native soil, perhaps Bush Junior would not be fighting terrorism. When the       Taliban ordered the destruction of two 2,000 years old Buddhist statues in       Ghorband Valley, Afghanistan, and Amnesty International pleaded for       assistance for abused Afghan women, Bush did not offer sympathy or support.       Apparently, Bush Junior's "War on Terrorism" is a selective war.              Chomsky reveals, "The eleventh was the first time the United States was       attacked on the mainland since the British burned down Washington in 1814.       The instances of the United States waging a home front battle have been few       since the US's inception, due largely to the US policy of invading outside       territories. History has shown that oppressive groups using unnecessary and       brutal force to accomplish an end become the victims of their wrongdoing."              A classic example of Chomsky's assertion is the once great Roman Empire,       which lacked the administrative structure to govern its new territories.              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca