XPost: bc.politics, free.activism.walmart   
   From: kmoiarty35@shaw.ca   
      
   I want to qualify my statement, "judging by the lack of supportive responses   
   to my post on this": This was an error. I was actually referring to   
   responses I received to my other posting on this issue in another newsgroup   
   (van.general). Sorry about that.   
      
   Ken   
      
      
   "Ken Moiarty" wrote in message   
   news:wAApd.342403$nl.239299@pd7tw3no...   
   >   
   > "EricŪ" wrote in message   
   > news:MPG.1c1049d0a15e7626989876@news.telus.net...   
   >>   
   >> You've robably noticed that they have high fences between the Trans-   
   >> Canada and 'new' subdivisions in the Fraser valley - in order to block   
   >> out some of the traffic noise. Where I live housing developments near   
   >> rr tracks have included an earth berm to do the same. Did they do that   
   >> in your area?   
   >   
   > No, there's nothing like that here. I've seen high fences that look like   
   > wood from the road, but upon closer inspection I realized were actually   
   > made of some kind of concrete. I remember how out of curiosity I went   
   > behind one such fence (at one end of it) to test for myself its effect on   
   > noise. I was amazed at the stark difference (reduction) in noise level   
   > emanating from the heavy traffic at that time. This fence was obviously   
   > designed with ascetic considerations in view, probably pushing its cost   
   > higher than many would like to imagine. Sure would be nice if something   
   > like that could be put up around here by the tracks. But judging by the   
   > lack of supportive responses to my post on this, I doubt there would be   
   > enough public will (or even interest) towards funding such a project for   
   > this, hardly upper-income, neighborhood.   
   >   
   >> I still hear the trains, but then I like trains.   
   >   
   > Like I said, I like trains too. Just not when the volume of their horns   
   > is downright overwhelming intrusive (and *unrelentingly so, all day and   
   > all night) as it presently is here. (*I should add, there have been some,   
   > seemingly perhaps 'considerate', exceptions when at night a train's horn   
   > will sound quieter and/or much briefer. But this is the exception. It   
   > seems there may be permitted some discretion exercised by the engineer of   
   > a train, and/or train company, in choosing "how" to sound the horn when   
   > it's late at night. But even so, it's obvious most choose simply to apply   
   > the horn at full blast without any consideration of the time of night.)   
   >   
   >> I don't think that   
   >> there's any way they'd stop sounding their horns - it's amazing how   
   >> something so enormous can be so quiet when it's approaching you.   
   >>   
   >   
   > That's because most of the vast sound energy emanating from the train's   
   > horn is reaching to areas far outside of and beyond where it actually   
   > needs to be heard.   
   >   
   > Ken   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|