Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.activism.community    |    alt.activism.community    |    1,639 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 999 of 1,639    |
|    Sarah to All    |
|    Labor Media May Be Our Best Hope Against    |
|    22 May 04 22:59:21    |
      XPost: alt.activism, alt.activism.d, alt.activism.peacefire       XPost: alt.activism.student       From: clslate@gwtc.net              Labor Media May Be Our Best Hope Against the Corporate Version              By David Swanson              There is a growing consensus in the United States that mainstream commercial       media are by and large not mainstream at all but instead are supportive of       the corporate agenda. Of course, the largest media companies (which provide       most Americans' news) and their large advertisers are themselves mammoth       corporations. In addition to promoting policies that advance corporate       interests, our major media often appear to place profits ahead of investing       in in-depth quality journalism.              To be sure, there are numerous web-based, alternative, and       community-supported media challenging the corporate consensus. But for all       their integrity and brilliance, these media outlets cannot challenge       corporate power. They're too small, they don't frame issues on a national       scale, they don't win debates, and they don't set the political agenda.              But there is a sleeping giant among these alternatives, one that was a major       force in our country in the past * and which could be so again. Some of its       overseas counterparts already have demonstrated their power as opinion       shapers. This giant has its own potentially enormous supply of funding --       one that comes without corporate ties attached. And it is uniquely       positioned to shift our habits of media consumption and participation.              I'm talking about the labor media.              I don't mean the handful of remaining labor reporters at daily newspapers or       their talented but equally limited counterparts in the progressive       magazines. I mean the actual or potential newspapers, magazines, radio       shows, TV shows and websites produced by the thousands of labor unions in       this country, the 64 international unions, the central labor councils,       regional labor press associations, state federations of labor, the AFL-CIO       and the ILCA (International Labor Communications Association), as well as       numerous independent outlets that focus on labor and workers' issues from       workers' points of view. The labor media are "member-supported" entities       with an unmatched membership base, but they need more support from union       members and leaders if they are ever to realize their full potential.              We've done it before. We used to have thousands of labor publications, but       now are down to a scattering of national magazines, a couple of scholarly       journals, and small and struggling newspapers or none at all at many unions.       While this decline has paralleled that of organized labor, it's not       necessarily for lack of resources. Rather, labor has spent entirely too       much on advertising on corporate media and on attempts to spin corporate       reporters, instead of putting its energy into its own media presence. And       by carefully accepting more advertising from union companies not engaged in       labor disputes, labor could increase its media resources.              If we set our minds to it, the labor movement is capable of producing much       more substantial publications, including major national weeklies not written       solely for the membership of any one union, but for the vast majority of       Americans who are being shortchanged by the corporate media. That includes       the 42 million Americans who say they would like to join a union but haven't       been able to. Better labor radio and TV shows are entirely within our grasp       as well. But to achieve these goals we'll also have to increase labor media       democracy, making our publications inclusive of more workers' views --       including those who disagree with union leaders. Otherwise, the labor media       will not be credible to readers in or out of the organized labor movement.              As documented by Andy Zipser, in an article titled "The Labor Press:       watchdog, lapdog, or canary in the mine shaft?" the labor movement has done       this in the past. Indeed, the labor press was so large 50 years ago that       the Wall Street Journal worried, prior to the 1952 elections, that "the       influence of the labor press could be a potent factor in determining voting       results." The labor press was important enough to prompt President-elect       Jack Kennedy to send a message to the 1960 convention of the ILPA       (predecessor to the ILCA), expressing his "deep gratitude for the       unprecedented support which the labor press gave to the Kennedy-Johnson       ticket."              Four years later, the ILPA convention included a televised speech by       Johnson, followed by questions from labor editors. The 1966 convention       included an address by Vice President Hubert Humphrey and a reception at the       White House, at which Johnson again spoke.              But in subsequent decades labor unions, feeling financially pinched, began       turning inward -- and one place where cutbacks have hit hard is in       publications. Many unions now are lagging in the development of websites,       and precious few radio and television shows address workers' concerns. In       addition, many labor papers fail to make room for letters to the editor or       guest columns by members dissenting from viewpoints expressed by a union's       leadership.              At the ILCA, which is the professional association of labor journalists, we       see our mission as one of assisting labor editors with resources that will       free up more of their time for reporting, and of advocating within the labor       movement for greater investment in the labor media and in more democratic       labor media. To these ends, we are developing a clearing house to put       journalism students in touch with labor media internship programs. We are       creating a certificate program in labor communications, to be made available       at various locations around the country. We are working with advertisers to       place more advertising (and money) in labor publications. And, in the       coming months, we will be turning our website at ILCAonline.org into a       source of articles on labor that can be shared among ILCA members, as well       as national reporting from independent media sources.              Our goal is to create an alternative to the corporate news that currently       obscures more than it reveals about the lives of American workers. Although       such efforts will be subject to accusations of bias, we believe that by       openly contrasting news for working families with the corporate press, we       will enhance the growing public awareness that corporate news is not       "objective" or "viewpoint-free." This shift in understanding might even prod              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca