XPost: alt.athiesm, alt.flame.jesus.christ, alt.talk.creationism
XPost: sci.skeptic
From: me@nothere.biz
On 30-December-2014 2:11 PM, Free Lunch wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:02:04 +1100, felix_unger wrote:
>
>> On 30-December-2014 1:27 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
>>
>>> "felix_unger" skrev i meddelelsen
>>> news:cgdpvbFdtgnU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>
>>> (snip)
>>>
>>>> ... atheists cannot prove God does not exist, you can only believe it
>>>> to be the case, and so you have faith that belief is correct.
>>> And so do you, have faith, when you believe in the non-existence of
>>> invisible pink unicorns in a parallel universe, right?
>> I have faith (confidence) in a belief that such a proposition is
>> nonsense is true
> Yet the IPU relies on exactly as much evidence
wrong. there is no evidence for the IPU
> as the deity you worship.
and still you lie about me. if you continue to do so, I will disengage.
I might as well, you have persisted on every occasion that I have
engaged with you.
>
>>> I don't believe we're all brains soaking in pods in a matrix, either,
>>> even if I can't prove it, and it doesn't take faith to not believe it.
>>> I live my life, as if we aren't 'soakers' and as if there are no gods.
>>> All three possibilites are equally absurd, and to make it a question
>>> about faith shows a lack of understanding.
>>>
>>> But... why can't you and so many of the, openly, theistic minded,
>>> understand that it does not take faith to not believe in something,
>>> which takes faith to have belief in the existence of?
>> it doesn't take faith to not believe, but it takes faith to believe that
>> a belief is correct/true. ie.. one has faith that ones belief is
>> correct. Is it not so?
> It is not so.
>
> It takes no faith not to believe in deities.
>
> It takes no faith to accept scientific evidence.
>
> It takes no faith to accept logical proofs.
ok, prove there is no God. you can't.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
