XPost: alt.athiesm, alt.flame.jesus.christ, alt.talk.creationism
XPost: sci.skeptic
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:23:22 -0600, Free Lunch wrote:
>On Wed, 31 Dec 2014 09:23:57 +1100, felix_unger wrote:
>
>>On 31-December-2014 3:59 AM, Free Lunch wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 15:55:08 +1100, felix_unger wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 30-December-2014 2:11 PM, Free Lunch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 14:02:04 +1100, felix_unger wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 30-December-2014 1:27 PM, Malte Runz wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "felix_unger" skrev i meddelelsen
>>>>>>> news:cgdpvbFdtgnU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (snip)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ... atheists cannot prove God does not exist, you can only believe it
>>>>>>>> to be the case, and so you have faith that belief is correct.
>>>>>>> And so do you, have faith, when you believe in the non-existence of
>>>>>>> invisible pink unicorns in a parallel universe, right?
>>>>>> I have faith (confidence) in a belief that such a proposition is
>>>>>> nonsense is true
>>>>> Yet the IPU relies on exactly as much evidence
>>>> wrong. there is no evidence for the IPU
>>> Which is exactly as much evidence as you have for every other deity.
>>
>>wrong
>
>So you allege, but you never manage to present any evidence for any
>deities.
>
>>>>> as the deity you worship.
>>>> and still you lie about me. if you continue to do so, I will disengage.
>>>> I might as well, you have persisted on every occasion that I have
>>>> engaged with you.
>>> It's hard to believe you are atheist
>>
>>I am not
>
>Then why do you seem to try to hide which deity you worship?
>
>>> since you spend so much time
>>> attacking atheism and defending theism.
>>
>>I have been arguing against claims that atheists make, and make about
>>themselves. you ppl just never seem to get this.
>
>You have been making claims
Like what?
>, not arguments. Your assertions are without
>substantiation. No evidence or valid argument ever follows from your
>claims.
>
>Which deity do you think has supporting evidence?
>
>Why can't you be bothered to present that alleged evidence to us?
You are evidence. I present you to you. By lying that there's no evidence
you ARE evidence of Satan's influence on human minds, whether Satan actually
exists or not.
>>>>>>> I don't believe we're all brains soaking in pods in a matrix, either,
>>>>>>> even if I can't prove it, and it doesn't take faith to not believe it.
>>>>>>> I live my life, as if we aren't 'soakers' and as if there are no gods.
>>>>>>> All three possibilites are equally absurd, and to make it a question
>>>>>>> about faith shows a lack of understanding.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But... why can't you and so many of the, openly, theistic minded,
>>>>>>> understand that it does not take faith to not believe in something,
>>>>>>> which takes faith to have belief in the existence of?
>>>>>> it doesn't take faith to not believe, but it takes faith to believe that
>>>>>> a belief is correct/true. ie.. one has faith that ones belief is
>>>>>> correct. Is it not so?
>>>>> It is not so.
>>>>>
>>>>> It takes no faith not to believe in deities.
>>>>>
>>>>> It takes no faith to accept scientific evidence.
>>>>>
>>>>> It takes no faith to accept logical proofs.
>>>> ok, prove there is no God. you can't.
>>> I have no need to prove there are no deities. You demand that I make a
>>> general proof of the negative, something you know cannot be done. Since
>>> you implied about that you are atheist, why do you spend so much time
>>> defending theism?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
