XPost: alt.athiesm, alt.flame.jesus.christ, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Thu, 01 Jan 2015 23:15:38 -0500, mur.@.not. wrote:   
      
   >On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:23:45 -0600, Free Lunch  wrote:   
   >.   
   >>On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 07:44:26 -0500, mur.@.not. wrote:   
   >>   
   ...   
   >>>    No. If there is a designer then it's pretty obvious that he made use of   
   the   
   >>>evolutionary method of developing life on this planet, even though we can't   
   jump   
   >>>in the "lab" with him and see exactly how he went about making it take   
   place.   
   >>>That's one of the basic starting lines atheists are unable to get as "far"   
   as.   
   >>>Can you?   
   >>   
   >>Show us your evidence that a designer did something. As far as I can   
   >>tell, your argument is that science is right, but that you want to add a   
   >>designer that you have absolutely no evidence for, a designer that is   
   >>indistinguishable from nothing   
   >   
   >    Yet WE have no reason to believe the proof you demand should be available   
   to   
   >humans, much less do any of us have any idea what you're imaginig it should   
   be,   
   >or where it should be, or why it should be available to us, or when it should   
   >have been or should be made available. Your supposed criticism means NOTHING,   
   >and you can't even pretend it does mean anything as you consistently prove   
   every   
   >time you're challenged on it.   
      
   I never demand proof. I ask for evidence. You offer excuses.   
      
   Why do you believe that any deity exists when you make such an effort to   
   justify the lack of evidence that your deity exists?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)