XPost: alt.atheism, sci.skeptic, alt.christnet   
   XPost: alt.religion.islam   
      
   On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 15:41:07 -0500, " R. Dean" <"R. Dean"@gmail.com> wrote:   
      
   >On 5/23/2014 9:58 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:   
   >> duke  wrote in   
   >> news:b3fvn9p71depr35b5m224jubmqgfd7vj4m@4ax.com:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>> I'm not the one in denial.  You are with your constant barking that   
   >>> there's no God when I give you evidence that can't be without a   
   >>> creator.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>      If everything that exists has to have a   
   >> creator then who created the creator?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >This is according to the laws of physics, like every action causes   
   >an equal and opposite reaction. Which is based upon Newton's third   
   >law.   
   >However, modern laws of physics break down at Planck Time (10^-43 sec)   
   >after the big bang and cannot be applied before Planck Time. Therefore,   
   >the "origin" of the "creator" must fall before Planck Time, thus the   
   >modern laws of physics do not apply.   
      
       Whether God exists or not the existence of everything is no more or less   
   understandable since it seems that it all had to somehow come into existence   
   from nothing at some point along the way, and saying that God always existed   
   and   
   finally just said "be" or something similar to that doesn't explain anything at   
   all.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)