XPost: alt.athiesm, alt.flame.jesus.christ, alt.talk.creationism   
   XPost: sci.skeptic   
   From: lunch@nofreelunch.us   
      
   On Sun, 11 Jan 2015 14:52:17 +1100, felix_unger  wrote:   
      
   >On 11-January-2015 12:28 PM, Free Lunch wrote:   
   >> On Sun, 11 Jan 2015 11:57:14 +1100, felix_unger  wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 11-January-2015 5:11 AM, mur.@.not. wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 20:04:01 -0600, Free Lunch    
   wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> When you stop offering fake evidence, I won't have to call you out on   
   >>>>> your dishonest claims.   
   >>>>       Like what?   
   >>> LOL!  he obviously doesn't realize, but he just admitted there IS   
   >>> evidence! lol!   
   >> I realize that reality is beyond your grasp, but fake evidence is not   
   >> evidence. False claims about evidence are not evidence.   
   >   
   >It has to be evidence in the first place to be deemed fake evidence, lol!   
      
   What ignorant claims you proudly make. You falsely call things evidence   
   when they clearly do not qualify. You fake yourself out, no one else is   
   persuaded that your delusions matter.   
      
   >> You know that you have no evidence to support any of the claims you or   
   >> any theist makes about any deity.   
   >   
   >wrong   
      
   You and mur can go tell each other lies and give each other high fives   
   about how impressed you are with your ignorant lies.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)