XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
      
   On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:44:17 -0800, Jeanne Douglas    
   wrote:   
   .   
   >In article <6kegba5bsp77juf1sdap2iup4qpf7urmqf@4ax.com>, mur wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Sun, 11 Jan 2015 06:00:52 -0800, Jeanne Douglas    
   >> wrote:   
   >> .   
   >> >In article <129f3254a1890a73efd847857aa101e5@dizum.com>,   
   >> > "Thomas"  wrote:   
   >> >   
   >> >> In article    
   >> >> mur.@.not. wrote:   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> > On Tue, 6 Jan 2015 00:51:51 +0000 (UTC), "70.66.89.54@sjrb.ca"   
   >> >> > <70.66.89.54@sjrb.ca> wrote:   
   >> >> > .   
   >> >> > >On 05 Jan 2015, §pammer§top  posted some   
   >> >> > >news:ZEDqw.196226$_R5.48954@fx28.iad:   
   >> >> > >   
   >> >> > >> From: §pammer§top    
   >> >> > >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0)   
   >> >> > >> Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0   
   >> >> > >> Message-ID:    
   >> >> > >> NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.66.89.54   
   >> >> > >> X-Complaints-To: internet.abuse@sjrb.ca   
   >> >> > >> X-Trace: 1420494521 70.66.89.54 (Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:48:41 UTC)   
   >> >> > >> NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 21:48:41 UTC   
   >> >> > >> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 13:49:06 -0800   
   >> >> > >> X-Received-Bytes: 1407   
   >> >> > >> X-Received-Body-CRC: 282770615   
   >> >> >   
   >> >> >      I'll tell you a little bit. They claim that there is no evidence   
   of   
   >> >> >      God's   
   >> >> > existence which is an obviously stupid claim because if there really   
   was   
   >> >> > none,   
   >> >> > no one would believe he exists because there would be nothing TO   
   >> >> > believe.   
   >> >> > Moving   
   >> >> > on with that stupidity we can conclude that their dishonest denial   
   means   
   >> >> > they   
   >> >> > are very unsatisfied with and reject all evidence that does exist. This   
   >> >> > clearly   
   >> >> > tells us they believe that if God truly does exist there should be some   
   >> >> > sort of   
   >> >> > very strong verifiable evidence to the point of being proof that he   
   does   
   >> >> > exist.   
   >> >> > That much they make very clear. But! They have also made it very clear   
   >> >> > that   
   >> >> > even   
   >> >> > though they believe such "evidence"/proof should exist, they have no   
   >> >> > clue   
   >> >> > at all   
   >> >> > what it should be, where it should be, why it should even be available   
   >> >> > to   
   >> >> > humans, or when it should have been or should be made available. That's   
   >> >> > one   
   >> >> > of   
   >> >> > the amusing positions they are in.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Atheists don't like it that atheism has been deemed a religion   
   >> >> either.   
   >> >   
   >> >It hasn't been, so what is there not to like?   
   >>   
   >>     Strong atheism is a religious belief. How much faith a person has that   
   >>     there   
   >> is no God associated with this planet is what determines how strong an   
   >> atheist   
   >> that person is or is not. Someone with no faith about it is a weak atheist.   
   >> So   
   >> what is there that you don't like about those facts?   
   >   
   >   
   >What facts?   
      
       The ones I again pointed out for you. What is there that you don't like   
   about them, are you ashamed to say?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)