XPost: sac.politics, can.politics, alt.atheism   
   XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality   
      
   On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 19:49:37 -0500, "M.I.Wakefield"  wrote:   
   .   
   >On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 19:11:36 -0500, mur wrote:   
   >   
   >>On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 13:50:46 -0500, "M.I.Wakefield"  wrote:   
   >>.   
   >>>On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 13:45:15 -0500, mur wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 23:51:04 -0500, "M.I.Wakefield"    
   wrote:   
   >>>>.   
   >>>>>On Thu, 15 Jan 2015 17:09:13 -0500, mur wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>    Strong atheism is a religious belief. How much faith a person has   
   that   
   >>>>>> there   
   >>>>>>is no God associated with this planet is what determines how strong an   
   >>>>>>atheist   
   >>>>>>that person is or is not. Someone with no faith about it is a weak   
   atheist.   
   >>>>>>So   
   >>>>>>what is there that you don't like about those facts?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Did you have an older sibling who used your head to practice their   
   >>>>>basketball dribbling skills while you were an infant?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Or, is your father also your grandfather, and your mother is your sister?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Or, did you eat a lot of lead and mercury as a child?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Or, all of the above?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Because your level of stupidity doesn't happen on its own.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>    Notice that though you can hurl childlike insults like any stupid   
   moron can,   
   >>>>you are too stupid to be able to present any evidence that I was wrong   
   about   
   >>>>anything. You clearly displayed the fact that you don't like the facts I   
   pointed   
   >>>>out, and you also clearly displayed the fact that you can't even pretend I   
   was   
   >>>>wrong about any of them. All you did was to prance and flaunt your own   
   moronic   
   >>>>childlike stupidity and nothing more. What did you think you could gain by   
   doing   
   >>>>that, do you have any idea?   
   >>>   
   >>>You're the one claiming that there are gods   
   >>   
   >>    Present your supposed quotes or it will reveal you as a liar.   
   >   
   >If there were any gods, one of you bozos would have stumbled across *some*   
   >reliable evidence in the last nine or ten thousand years.   
      
       Here's a challenge that has completely defeated every atheist in these ngs   
   for months and months to the point that none of them have been able to provide   
   a   
   single respectable reply to it. See if you can be the first to: Try to explain   
   WHAT type of evidence you think there should be, WHERE you think it should be,   
   WHY you think it should be available to humans, and WHEN you think it should   
   have been or should be made available, if there truly is a God associated with   
   this planet.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)